Return-Path: <amdragon@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 106B540DBD5
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:59:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id QbImmHRa5maI for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:59:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (DMZ-MAILSEC-SCANNER-1.MIT.EDU
	[18.9.25.12])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0449640DBC8
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:59:22 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 1209190c-b7ba9ae0000009f8-1a-4ce2c67a8917
Received: from mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.35])
	by dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with
	SMTP id 82.B4.02552.A76C2EC4; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:59:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103])
	by mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id oAGHxLat021368; 
	Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:59:21 -0500
Received: from awakening.csail.mit.edu (awakening.csail.mit.edu [18.26.4.91])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	(User authenticated as amdragon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
	by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id oAGHxKrd000163
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
	Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:59:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from amthrax by awakening.csail.mit.edu with local (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <amdragon@mit.edu>)
	id 1PIPoN-0005Yx-UG; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:59:19 -0500
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:59:19 -0500
From: Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>
To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
Subject: Re: Improved search speed by 2.5X
Message-ID: <20101116175919.GB2439@mit.edu>
References: <20101116161842.GA2439@mit.edu>
 <87bp5pxl1j.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87bp5pxl1j.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:59:33 -0000

Quoth David Edmondson on Nov 16 at  4:58 pm:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:18:43 -0500, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU> wrote:
> > [1] Except for 2 emacs tests that depend on author order.  What order
> > are matched authors *supposed* to be in?
> 
> In IRC cworth confirmed that he considered the current behaviour a bug,
> which is to say that the authors should be sorted by first occurrence in
> the thread.

Ah, perfect.  That's what my patch does most naturally.