Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB324196F2 for ; Thu, 20 May 2010 01:25:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.89 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AtuwZ05DQyZw for ; Thu, 20 May 2010 01:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1E3431FC1 for ; Thu, 20 May 2010 01:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so345295wyf.26 for ; Thu, 20 May 2010 01:25:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.154.11 with SMTP id m11mr8928382wbw.165.1274343940962; Thu, 20 May 2010 01:25:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ut.hh.sledj.net (gmp-ea-fw-1b.sun.com [192.18.8.1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u36sm29729706wbv.18.2010.05.20.01.25.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 20 May 2010 01:25:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ut.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DF28D594081; Thu, 20 May 2010 09:25:45 +0100 (BST) To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: multiple machine tagging User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3.1-50-gc535d0a (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: David Edmondson Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 09:25:42 +0100 Message-ID: <87vdaj2d4p.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 08:25:53 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable What's the current state of the art in merging tags from multiple machines? In my own case the contents of the mail store can be considered identical on the different machines. Automated tagging is mostly fine - it can just happen on each of the machines. Any hand-added tags are a problem, though. dme. =2D-=20 David Edmondson, http://dme.org --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkv08gYACgkQaezQq/BJZRaV9gCeMRiKgYrA8+2IGgHa/i6KfwkC mVgAn2Vr0hNXEWExOtAPWakZ7Tel0Yrf =sVv2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--