Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E5D41733A for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 05:05:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wlMnb-L+m4-g for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 05:05:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcbef.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.145]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E75A4196F4 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 05:05:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sspaeth.de (mtec-hg-docking-1-dhcp-204.ethz.ch [129.132.133.204]) by homiemail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0A20125006B; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 05:05:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:05:42 +0200 From: "Sebastian Spaeth" To: Michal Sojka , Carl Worth , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Derive version numbers from git In-Reply-To: <87y6h16lun.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> References: <87hbnpo1yu.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87y6h16lun.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:05:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87pr2c7pm1.fsf@SSpaeth.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 12:05:48 -0000 On 2010-04-06, Michal Sojka wrote: > I often have several versions of notmuch compiled and it would be very > helpful to be able to distinguish between them. Git has a very nice > feature to make intermediate numbering automatic and unambiguous so > let's use it here. But, there are people without git installed that download the release tarball. So if this patch makes it, we need to replace this with a static version number when baking a release tar. Sebastian