Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79BA9431FB6 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:44:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tf7HhY4UzEU1 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:44:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6562431FAE for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:44:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id h11so8111029wiw.2 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:44:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=goB9QvHDJy0tXIyNPN1KHpDmrmhVK7GstKd3qdLFdA4=; b=b70McnuqdCGj1KOD+Kq5HXy8UXgn3uHGrTOtriLdbFKXlO8QGnbESnWZIe5LfxqFJS V7PdgxNKADiXc7mASTuBos9c5D8rRSlzUB9D+X13s30PHtruPuH9Nw3gwy72fMubSxnP dLqfLGUz0XS1aSEwvJQtCJjIbVKeuRZVtwaW9kQ1pEJ8XAfUWNo/A0gFVySKWzcsM3Ub i5xirQHqufcRl5zjMLRwUZgJpKo1LS58/TvSWaR3OG2zkf/wK47+hK+Cbgaxid/Natdk QqbqM5WhPHI7WCfc80P7DuUIjmr/qtRcpYNateZxvj4aX4RUb/mxf0BpsJ0HuiGvJRK4 8cXw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkxs+ep/EK8SDe3MS22SFNdVWzNT3qz9+pIKMMjNKV0txDDcHlZt+X5FDxMKtZG/+GuPgfL X-Received: by 10.194.191.163 with SMTP id gz3mr5589192wjc.114.1414518265925; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:44:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw2-58c36d-48.dhcp.inet.fi. [88.195.109.48]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id t9sm2559257wjf.41.2014.10.28.10.44.24 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:44:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Jani Nikula To: sshilovsky@gmail.com, Jesse Rosenthal Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid empty thread names if possible. In-Reply-To: References: <87oatnakqy.fsf@jhu.edu> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.2+148~g0318cd3 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 19:44:23 +0200 Message-ID: <87h9yonl6w.fsf@nikula.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 17:44:33 -0000 On Wed, 08 Oct 2014, Sergei Shilovsky wrote: > I would also suggest to drop subjects consisting of only "Re:" and > "Fwd" sequences I think it's okay to avoid empty thread names at the lib level; however I think any further processing should be done near the user interface. BR, Jani.