Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3589F431FAF for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 06:15:58 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5mPj3XL-ZhzY for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 06:15:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (DMZ-MAILSEC-SCANNER-5.MIT.EDU [18.7.68.34]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B8E431FAE for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 06:15:57 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 12074422-b7fd66d0000008f9-4f-4f2fe09adbbb Received: from mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.36]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 99.88.02297.A90EF2F4; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:15:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103]) by mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id q16EFrZi010758; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:15:54 -0500 Received: from awakening.csail.mit.edu (awakening.csail.mit.edu [18.26.4.91]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as amdragon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id q16EFonX022585 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:15:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from amthrax by awakening.csail.mit.edu with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1RuPL5-0006ur-Q4; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:14:39 -0500 Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:14:39 -0500 From: Austin Clements To: Jani Nikula Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cli: convert "notmuch show" to use the new argument parser Message-ID: <20120206141439.GR10898@mit.edu> References: <20120206041205.GP10898@mit.edu> <87ty34bdnp.fsf@nikula.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ty34bdnp.fsf@nikula.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrHIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixG6nojvrgb6/wcw3uhZN050trt+cyezA 5HHr/mt2j2erbjEHMEVx2aSk5mSWpRbp2yVwZey684K94Bh7xekp55kbGF+zdjFyckgImEi8 a3/ICGGLSVy4t54NxBYS2Mco0dcnC2GvZ5To7+CEsE8wSXS3+XcxcgHZSxglbvydAzSIg4NF QEVi1QNRkBo2AQ2JbfuXg80UEVCU2HxyP5jNLCAt8e13MxOILSwQKvF31UR2EJtXQEdi9o0G Voj50xglvu6QhIgLSpyc+YQFoldL4sa/l0wgq0DmLP/HAWJyAq26t0kBpEIU6IApJ7exTWAU moWkeRaS5lkIzQsYmVcxyqbkVunmJmbmFKcm6xYnJ+blpRbpmurlZpbopaaUbmIEB7OL0g7G nweVDjEKcDAq8fAqmuj7C7EmlhVX5h5ilORgUhLl5QPGghBfUn5KZUZicUZ8UWlOavEhRgkO ZiURXrVJQDnelMTKqtSifJiUNAeLkjivutY7PyGB9MSS1OzU1ILUIpisDAeHkgSvHMhQwaLU 9NSKtMycEoQ0EwcnyHAeoOGSIDW8xQWJucWZ6RD5U4yKUuK83+8DJQRAEhmleXC9sGTzilEc 6BVh3o8gVTzARAXX/QpoMBPQ4H1suiCDSxIRUlINjEJuR7+K9ixjKTTY1flwVT5zqKRgheT9 CZvvXfP5teaAgbWZ84MVXA9sU703uzR8S7p4RfTsRcMLPYE/TCrSdR8YfXfk5P93clVp4erS d3tPKu1/U1EmeE37vyPXN52kcPm0bedaTZbt+9vkenqPyu7F7z4+fmI+y0N6w+FYo7anq3uf pR6UvarEUpyRaKjFXFScCADwROTxEQMAAA== Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:15:58 -0000 Quoth Jani Nikula on Feb 06 at 7:54 am: > On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 23:12:05 -0500, Austin Clements wrote: > > Yikes. I don't envy you this patch. Two minor nits, otherwise this > > and the next patch LGTM. > > Thanks for the review. I'll roll another version, I think it will be > better with your suggestions incorporated. > > > Quoth Jani Nikula on Feb 04 at 12:41 am: > > > Use the new notmuch argument parser to handle arguments in "notmuch > > > show". There are two corner case functional changes: > > > > > > 1) Also set params.raw = 1 when defaulting to raw format when part is > > > requested but format is not specified. > > > > Huh. So "notmuch show --part=0 " was broken before. > > Hmm, yes, it seems so. Do you think I should make this a separate fix? I wouldn't bother. Since this usage would throw --format=raw into "useless mode", clearly no one cared. No sense throwing good code after bad.