Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B19C431FC3 for ; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 02:27:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bD9qYLUWoyCP for ; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 02:26:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89AB2431FB6 for ; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 02:26:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40]) by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Va08x-0003Mu-Pv; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:26:52 +0100 Received: from 93-97-24-31.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.24.31] helo=localhost) by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Va08x-0002xx-I7; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:26:51 +0100 From: Mark Walters To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Move pick into mainline In-Reply-To: <1382257699-29860-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> References: <1382257699-29860-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.16 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:26:49 +0100 Message-ID: <87wql0757q.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Sender-Host-Address: 93.97.24.31 X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :) X-QM-Body-MD5: 5cf06274c480fd6291bcf24c42f5d2bf (of first 20000 bytes) X-SpamAssassin-Score: 0.0 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: / X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to determine if it is spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam. This message scored 0.0 points. Summary of the scoring: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com) * 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 09:27:01 -0000 > One thing to think about: do we want to keep the name "pick"? If not > then now is the last sensible time to change it. I don't have any > better suggestion however. There have been some suggestions on irc and I give some pros and cons keep the name pick tree/treeview navigation view forest explorer (not serious I think) zoom I think I am happy with any of the first three. At some point later I might add a flat (unthreaded) version of pick (eg just show the matching messages in date order, like mutt's unthreaded views); I don't know if we want a name which will be sensible for that. My thoughts on the names: "pick" is not a very intuitive name, but it is established and would do the unthreaded view too. "tree" is very intuitive. It might be odd for the unthreaded view. "navigation" is intuitive and would be fine for the unthreaded view. It does seem rather long for prefixes in lisp files. Perhaps use navigation for the name for documentation but pick or tree as the list prefix? The current series no longer applies to master (since Austin's series touched the pick file). I thought it might be worth settling on a name before reposting. Best wishes Mark