Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5284196F3 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:38:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.89 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sx7NxYfmzA5R; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:38:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4570431FC1; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:38:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 727FC568DE4; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:38:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Carl Worth To: Sebastian Spaeth , Notmuch list Subject: Re: python cnotmuch -> notmuch In-Reply-To: <87aaszmdca.fsf@SSpaeth.de> References: <87aaszmdca.fsf@SSpaeth.de> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:38:37 -0700 Message-ID: <8739yowcc2.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:38:38 -0000 --=-=-= On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:50:13 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote: > I believe that Carl pursues an evil plan of converting unsuspicious > mercurial users to git. At least that is what I suspect when he asked > whether it would make sense to get my cnotmuch python bindings into the notmuch > repo. :-) Or perhaps Sebastian has an evil plan to dominate the "git shortlog" output for the next release cycle. > Carl, I did not update the .hgignore to be .gitignore yet. I recommend > to just ignore *.pyc and the docs/html dir (just have a look at > .hgignore). As for the directory to stick this in, I don't care. Does > "bindings/python" make sense? Also, I have a debian dir to produce a > .deb package, not sure what to do with that. I went ahead with "bindings/python" yes. For the Debian package, if we can do get "make install" to do the right thing then it's a pretty easy thing to add a section to debian/control and add a could of .install files. If there are any other python-specific packaging tasks we can move them from bindings/python/debian to debian as well. Though that brings up the question of what to name the Debian package for these bindings. A quick "apt-cache search python" suggests that python-notmuch might not be a crazy name. What do you think, Sebastian? -Carl --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLz5qN6JDdNq8qSWgRAloHAJwOegm/veMpUcQCr+AIb49iEBFgQACeMkwi w5/1KH0Y2BIrGZG8FhpYaqE= =YfSW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--