Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98AD6431FB6 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 09:41:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gPjtbNtCZW4z for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 09:41:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3556431FB5 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 09:41:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3t1W-0006a4-Iz for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 18:41:06 +0200 Received: from c-71-237-233-41.hsd1.or.comcast.net ([71.237.233.41]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 18:41:06 +0200 Received: from mueen by c-71-237-233-41.hsd1.or.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 18:41:06 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org From: mueen@nawaz.org Subject: Re: Sorting and attachments Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 09:40:31 -0700 Lines: 50 Message-ID: <874o6ozfcw.fsf@fester.com> References: <878vw1yxia.fsf@fester.com> <871v1tm8e4.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-71-237-233-41.hsd1.or.comcast.net Cancel-Lock: sha1:sLPumHq2YCgBNT7MP5yLeHiEQUs= X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 16:41:17 -0000 Jameson Graef Rollins writes: > On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 21:53:49 -0700, mueen@nawaz.org wrote: >> 1. Can notmuch return results sorted by size? > > As far as I know, there is currently no way to do that (but see below). It would be really convenient. Would this be a challenging task? >> 2. Can I tell notmuch to limit the items it returns (e.g. show me >> first ten messages matching ... ) > > Are you looking for this in the emacs UI? The following works for me on > the command line: > > notmuch search '*' | head -10 Well, yes - I was thinking of the Emacs UI. I suppose I could just hack the .el files, but my knowledge of eLisp is fairly poor. >> 3. Any plans for searching via attachment size or type? Say I want all >> emails with attachments bigger than 1 MB. > > You can currently search through attachments with the 'attachment:' > search term. See "notmuch help search-terms" for more info. This works > for searching for mime types. I don't know of a way to search by size, > though. Again, that would be really convenient. I don't know if it would be challenging. though. >> Essentially, I have a tendency to prune off large attachments so that >> my mail directory doesn't blow up... > > You might just try using find, which is very useful for this kind of > thing: > > find $MAILDIR -printf '%b %p\n' | sort -n Well, I would want to exclude certain tags in the query... In my current mutt workflow, I'm a lot more aggressive. Once I'm done looking at a (binary) attachment, I actively save or delete it. Then every few months I just tell mutt to sort by size and delete any attachments I may have missed. I don't expect the exact same workflow with notmuch, but I was trying to find some way to handle this.