Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B35B6DE012F for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:20:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.018 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.018 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.007, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nrLFOgv3s77L for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:20:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB35C6DE0127 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:20:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1apm46-0002uB-Ep; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 20:20:22 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 21213 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:20:11 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: notmuch-emacs replying produces excessive indenting on multipart/signed or multipart/mixed amil? In-Reply-To: <87ziszson5.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> References: <87lh4nm62m.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <87wpo6fvju.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87ziszson5.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+99~gd93d377 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:20:11 -0300 Message-ID: <8760vn7k5g.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:20:25 -0000 Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > On Sat 2016-04-09 15:09:57 -0400, David Bremner wrote: >> I don't see it in "0.21+99~gd93d377" with emacs -q. Can you try that, >> and if there is some settings issue? > > did you script your test? if so, would you mind sharing your script? > i think your emacs-fu is superior to mine. > > --dkg I have the feeling I don't understand the problem. I replied to your message, and didn't see any extra indentation there. I thought my reply to the list was test enough. So what am I missing? d