Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CCC4431FBC for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 22:52:55 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.207 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.207 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[MISSING_HEADERS=1.207] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AwtYut8PS751 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 22:52:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E26431FAF for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 22:52:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECDEA100093 for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 08:52:40 +0200 (EET) From: Tomi Ollila Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cli: crypto: tell gmime to use gpg-agent In-Reply-To: <513046D9.8000102@fifthhorseman.net> References: <1361950838-22919-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org> <87hakxpwcu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87r4k1znor.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <87ehg1pt2u.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87txoxwf1a.fsf@nikula.org> <87vc9cm12s.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <513046D9.8000102@fifthhorseman.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+45~g5d28a00 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 06:52:56 -0000 On Fri, Mar 01 2013, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 02/28/2013 04:10 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: >> I think this point makes sense. I guess my main worry was that querying >> the agent would have unintended consequences for someone who is not >> expecting it or specifically does not want it to be queried. But maybe >> the point is that if they don't want that to happen, then they should >> just not call notmuch with --decrypt. I suppose that's reasonable. > > I agree with this analysis. automatically asking gmime to invoke the > agent is the right thing to do. > > --dkg 4(5?) in favo(u)r, 0 against. dropped needs-review. Speak up if you disagree :D Tomi