Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2F9431FD0 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 02:21:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AC-osod34mOi for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 02:21:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz (max.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.36]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16626431FAF for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 02:21:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.200.7]) by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83FC5CCF17; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 10:21:25 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: IMAP STYX AMAVIS Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz ([192.168.200.1]) by localhost (styx.feld.cvut.cz [192.168.200.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10044) with ESMTP id a7fh1dNcWu86; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 10:21:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap.feld.cvut.cz (imap.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.34]) by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914805CCF12; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 10:21:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from wsh by steelpick.2x.cz with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1XkUs0-0001em-0f; Sat, 01 Nov 2014 10:21:16 +0100 From: Michal Sojka To: Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 7/7] cli: search: Add --filter-by option to configure address filtering In-Reply-To: <87mw8be1w2.fsf@nikula.org> References: <1414792441-29555-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> <1414792441-29555-8-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> <87mw8be1w2.fsf@nikula.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.2+157~ga00d359 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 10:21:16 +0100 Message-ID: <87egtn2s4z.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 09:21:36 -0000 On Sat, Nov 01 2014, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Fri, 31 Oct 2014, Michal Sojka wrote: >> This option allows to configure the criterion for duplicate address >> filtering. Without this option, all unique combinations of name and >> address parts are printed. This option allows to filter the output >> more, for example to only contain unique address parts. > > This patch finally makes me think we should have a separate 'notmuch > address' command for all of this. We are starting to have two orthogonal > sets of 'notmuch search' options, one set for search and another for > addresses. I regret not following the series and then making the > observation so late. To some extent it is true. The question is whether it would make sense for 'notmuch address' to have options like --offset and --limit. Probably not. I can prepare a new patchset implementing 'notmuch address' over the weekend. It would be necessary to revert the last (or two) already merged patch. What do others think? -Michal