Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25DE1431FD0 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:38:50 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GehqGWxKVd03 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:38:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-3.mit.edu (DMZ-MAILSEC-SCANNER-3.MIT.EDU [18.9.25.14]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C97B431FB6 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:38:49 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 1209190e-b7f7c6d0000008c3-b4-4f0d2068a6e7 Received: from mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.35]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-3.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 2C.A0.02243.8602D0F4; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:38:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103]) by mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id q0B5cj2W029708; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:38:45 -0500 Received: from awakening.csail.mit.edu (awakening.csail.mit.edu [18.26.4.91]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as amdragon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id q0B5ce2b020225 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:38:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from amthrax by awakening.csail.mit.edu with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Rkqtc-0002qH-A3; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:38:48 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:38:48 -0500 From: Austin Clements To: Jani Nikula Subject: Re: another attempt to add delete functionality in emacs Message-ID: <20120111053848.GR20796@mit.edu> References: <1325975294-646-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> <87sjjns4wz.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca> <87ehv7nd9r.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87obuau8dr.fsf@nikula.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87obuau8dr.fsf@nikula.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrNKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixCmqrJuhwOtvcHWZusWN1m5Gi313tjBZ NE13ttizz8vi+s2ZzA6sHrue/2XyuHuay+PW/dfsHs9W3WL22HLoPXMAaxSXTUpqTmZZapG+ XQJXxp0j5QXzuCrWH/RvYJzM0cXIySEhYCLxeXonM4QtJnHh3nq2LkYuDiGBfYwSZ64fY4Rw NjBKzPz7E8o5ySTxq+sTO4SzhFFi7or5bCD9LAKqEncf/WcHsdkENCS27V/OCGKLCChKbD65 H6ybWWATo0RHz2WwhcICjhI9X2Yzgdi8AjoSt/csg1r+mlGiccJ2VoiEoMTJmU9YQGxmAS2J G/9eAjVwANnSEsv/gT3BCbRs0en7YDNFBVQkppzcxjaBUWgWku5ZSLpnIXQvYGRexSibklul m5uYmVOcmqxbnJyYl5dapGusl5tZopeaUrqJERwPknw7GL8eVDrEKMDBqMTDa5DK4y/EmlhW XJl7iFGSg0lJlNdGntdfiC8pP6UyI7E4I76oNCe1+BCjBAezkggvmxxQjjclsbIqtSgfJiXN waIkzqum9c5PSCA9sSQ1OzW1ILUIJivDwaEkwfsVZKhgUWp6akVaZk4JQpqJgxNkOA/Q8Pcg NbzFBYm5xZnpEPlTjLoc1xvnnmMUYsnLz0uVEuc9D1IkAFKUUZoHNweWxl4xigO9JczbLAxU xQNMgXCTXgEtYQJasmUdD8iSkkSElFQD48y1pj/OlF86uOTCpFs2F7ewPuPybPjHkbOG48EC 6TDRXkXWgCfKvD4r2Zz4j0xN8LYvTD3wvE/mgpLd3LX/4+cYtLqJP7ayiHjXJhsQ//Ail6dn qbjOov9PeJvOuVSv+XpYPfXSrZxFemXxm941p5Xv0uxJq5r4Tud1ori/p3TLm6ojMVm7lFiK MxINtZiLihMBNM73VD4DAAA= Cc: Notmuch Mail X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 05:38:50 -0000 Quoth Jani Nikula on Jan 11 at 7:16 am: > On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:12:16 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:01:32 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > > > Just thinking out loud here, but it does seem a bit unfortunate to me > > > that it represents a pretty fundamental divergence between the CLI and > > > the emacs interface. Mind you, I guess one could make the same argument > > > about the libs versus the CLI. Lack of configuration information in the > > > library (possibly among other reasons) makes this not too nice to > > > support in the current library either. > > > > I think a consensus has formed that this functionality (automatically > > suppressing messages with certain tags from searches) is better left to > > the CLI, rather than implementing it just in the emacs UI. > > Unfortunately I'm not going to get to that any time soon. > > I could have a go at it, but I can't make any promises about getting to > that any time soon either. So what if emacs ui goes head first and does > something that should be done in the CLI in a perfect world? If it's > added properly, it can be taken out if/when this pops up in the CLI. Too late. See id:"1326258173-21163-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu"