Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF90B431FBC for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2010 14:17:49 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.905, BAYES_40=-0.185] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SsgTalO-D0q6 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2010 14:17:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qy0-f177.google.com (mail-qy0-f177.google.com [209.85.221.177]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88EE431FAE for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2010 14:17:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so809209qyk.10 for ; Sun, 07 Feb 2010 14:17:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=iEtf9+u7TgVFwBc7gl2Q241vpHUG4zeq03Rsd696m4c=; b=E4AaGdodoxdWufSg956jg0UQDjOWci9/XrvgyUaBISJdi+9Q53M0IoUit//Rl0YyAT wzcg5c/m4zGtLkIi5ZtV6sed9WxFHaQwDpa0vAnIwm89kPt7u3yRmc9KXUkG5cmjI8g5 IfwX7kWgSnkDfsxOV9VeofJ8qa6/nEBrANb6w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; b=j28kiGEhiC0A2Y9uK80KdUc7BGUv6yQp/r6VkcrkCiP89h6PQ6s4CHXMGfl0Q1vbCJ Obpag2+2dit5LgDZQJhvMq5j1VRD4LfFLTu+qtYTg1KckkcecC+v+ectybhZtR5f5pad dTIFyoTIAdYnFtRLFLdo0SOSmOT4SpedfKcFw= Received: by 10.224.42.138 with SMTP id s10mr2107967qae.210.1265581068271; Sun, 07 Feb 2010 14:17:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (vpm093.wireless-resnet.upenn.edu [165.123.236.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm2675590qyk.9.2010.02.07.14.17.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 07 Feb 2010 14:17:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4b6f3c0b.9453f10a.24c7.ffff99c1@mx.google.com> Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 17:17:46 -0500 From: Aaron Ecay To: Notmuch Mail In-Reply-To: <87y6j59hkq.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <87aavpb3wh.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87y6j59hkq.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.7 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/23.1 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] notmuch.el: colorize lines in notmuch-search based on thread tags. X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:17:49 -0000 --- 2010ko Otsailak 7an, "Aneesh Kumar K. V"-ek idatzi zuen: > Doesn't 92c4dcc641e9dfb5f65026ebae5cedc8eb1d9e21 help you achive something > similar ? That commit allows colors to be applied to the tag name only, whereas this patch applies the color to the whole line. Which method(s) notmuch should support is debatable, of course. Mutt does whole-line coloring, FWIW. I should also point out that tag-based coloring is problematic in the current emacs interface, wherein long subjects can push the tags off the right side of the window. That is arguably a bug, but until it is fixed the utility of tag-only coloring is limited. Aaron