From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>
To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>,
	notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Cc: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 5/6] cli/reply: pass gmime message to munge detection
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 23:15:33 +0300
Message-Id:
 <fb88de98628ea7e2282849b0149099bb999e4e4e.1466366738.git.jani@nikula.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1466366737.git.jani@nikula.org>
References: <cover.1466284726.git.jani@nikula.org>
 <cover.1466366737.git.jani@nikula.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1466366737.git.jani@nikula.org>
References: <cover.1466366737.git.jani@nikula.org>
Precedence: list

Improves the accuracy in many ways.
---
 notmuch-reply.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/notmuch-reply.c b/notmuch-reply.c
index cf4248bd6794..abf3a6c1824c 100644
--- a/notmuch-reply.c
+++ b/notmuch-reply.c
@@ -230,13 +230,16 @@ scan_address_list (InternetAddressList *list,
 /* Does the address in the Reply-To header of 'message' already appear
  * in either the 'To' or 'Cc' header of the message?
  */
-static int
-reply_to_header_is_redundant (notmuch_message_t *message,
+static notmuch_bool_t
+reply_to_header_is_redundant (GMimeMessage *message,
 			      InternetAddressList *reply_to_list)
 {
-    const char *to, *cc, *addr;
+    const char *addr, *reply_to;
     InternetAddress *address;
     InternetAddressMailbox *mailbox;
+    InternetAddressList *recipients;
+    notmuch_bool_t ret = FALSE;
+    int i;
 
     if (reply_to_list == NULL ||
 	internet_address_list_length (reply_to_list) != 1)
@@ -247,18 +250,26 @@ reply_to_header_is_redundant (notmuch_message_t *message,
 	return 0;
 
     mailbox = INTERNET_ADDRESS_MAILBOX (address);
-    addr = internet_address_mailbox_get_addr (mailbox);
+    reply_to = internet_address_mailbox_get_addr (mailbox);
 
-    to = notmuch_message_get_header (message, "to");
-    cc = notmuch_message_get_header (message, "cc");
+    recipients = g_mime_message_get_all_recipients (message);
 
-    if ((to && strstr (to, addr) != 0) ||
-	(cc && strstr (cc, addr) != 0))
-    {
-	return 1;
+    for (i = 0; i < internet_address_list_length (recipients); i++) {
+	address = internet_address_list_get_address (recipients, i);
+	if (INTERNET_ADDRESS_IS_GROUP (address))
+	    continue;
+
+	mailbox = INTERNET_ADDRESS_MAILBOX (address);
+	addr = internet_address_mailbox_get_addr (mailbox);
+	if (strcmp (addr, reply_to) == 0) {
+	    ret = TRUE;
+	    break;
+	}
     }
 
-    return 0;
+    g_object_unref (G_OBJECT (recipients));
+
+    return ret;
 }
 
 static InternetAddressList *get_sender(notmuch_message_t *message,
@@ -284,7 +295,7 @@ static InternetAddressList *get_sender(notmuch_message_t *message,
 	 * will always appear in the reply if reply_all is true.
 	 */
 	reply_to_list = internet_address_list_parse_string (reply_to);
-	if (! reply_to_header_is_redundant (message, reply_to_list))
+	if (! reply_to_header_is_redundant (mime_message, reply_to_list))
 	    return reply_to_list;
 
 	g_object_unref (G_OBJECT (reply_to_list));
-- 
2.1.4