Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1AC9429E54 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:38:08 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CCMGBHe+DWgv for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:38:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC316429E40 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:38:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40]) by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RolRZ-0003tn-Df; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:38:03 +0000 Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223] helo=localhost) by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RolRZ-0004V0-4z; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:38:01 +0000 From: Mark Walters To: Austin Clements Subject: Re: [PATCH] Automatically exclude tags in notmuch-show In-Reply-To: <20120120171801.GA16740@mit.edu> References: <874nvric7c.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <1327010583-23954-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> <20120119225910.GT16740@mit.edu> <871uqvgrnm.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <20120120171801.GA16740@mit.edu> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+77~gad6d0d5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:38:56 +0000 Message-ID: <87sjj8efkv.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223 X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :) X-QM-Body-MD5: 5c1f9aa1bccd3f1fa92cbb62d07ac311 (of first 20000 bytes) X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: - X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to determine if it is spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam. This message scored -1.8 points. Summary of the scoring: * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, * medium trust * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com) * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay * domain * 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:38:08 -0000 On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:18:01 -0500, Austin Clements wrote: > > Oh dear. > > Well, here's one idea. Instead of doing a single thread query in > show, do a thread query without the exclusions and then a message > query with the exclusions. Output all of the messages from the first > query, but use the results of the second query to determine which > messages are "matched". The same could be accomplished in the library > somewhat more efficiently, but it's not obvious to me what the API > would be. I have been thinking about this and one question is what should the sort order be? If I understand it correctly notmuch sorts the threads by the oldest/newest matching message, so the "correct" behaviour if no message matches is unclear. Perhaps all threads with a matching non-excluded message sorted by the matching-non-excluded message followed by all threads that match only on excluded messages with sort based on the matching excluded message? Best wishes Mark