Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F0C9429E37 for ; Sun, 4 May 2014 00:32:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.502 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9deuIncNtZyo for ; Sun, 4 May 2014 00:32:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9D95431FD6 for ; Sun, 4 May 2014 00:32:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40]) by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wgqu0-0000GQ-Ij; Sun, 04 May 2014 08:32:02 +0100 Received: from 5751dfa2.skybroadband.com ([87.81.223.162] helo=localhost) by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wgqu0-0007qp-7r; Sun, 04 May 2014 08:32:00 +0100 From: Mark Walters To: David Edmondson , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: precedence in `notmuch-search-line-faces' In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+615~g78e3a93 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 08:31:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87mwey3spc.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Sender-Host-Address: 87.81.223.162 X-QM-Geographic: According to ripencc, this message was delivered by a machine in Britain (UK) (GB). X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :) X-QM-Body-MD5: b6591f8fce483044b55f248c925836e3 (of first 20000 bytes) X-SpamAssassin-Score: -0.1 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: / X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to determine if it is spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam. This message scored -0.1 points. Summary of the scoring: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com) * -0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 07:32:17 -0000 I have a slight preference for making it do the comment (ie reverse the list). My reason is that we have some other cases such as notmuch-tag-format that apply the first match, so users might be used to having the specific first and the more general later. It also has a small advantage of being less disruptive but, given that I don't think any of us realised it changed, I guess most people aren't using multiple matches. Best wishes Mark On Fri, 02 May 2014, David Edmondson wrote: > The documentation for `notmuch-search-line-faces' says: > >> The attributes defined for matching tags are merged, with later >> attributes overriding earlier. > > A comment in `notmuch-search-color-line', which implements this, says: > >> ;; Reverse the list so earlier entries take precedence > > Clearly these two are at odds. The implementation of > `notmuch-search-color-line' follows the comment. That is, earlier > entries in the list take precedence. > > The original implementation of `notmuch-search-color-line' followed the > documentation of the user-visible variable, but this was changed by > commit 60ebc849 in July 2012. > > I'm inclined to go with the documentation and change the implementation, > but this could obviously ruin things for some users until they reorder > their settings. > > Thoughts? > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch