Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC27429E3B for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 11:22:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gFdjc80uA2oW for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 11:22:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [209.234.253.108]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D639429E38 for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 11:22:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.42.101] (h-67-101-156-40.nycm.ny.dynamic.megapath.net [67.101.156.40]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02325F986; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 14:22:48 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <5276A289.3070605@fifthhorseman.net> Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 14:22:49 -0500 From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Felipe Contreras , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Getting the right root mail of the thread References: <5274f93e254b5_6de7f51e7849@nysa.notmuch> In-Reply-To: <5274f93e254b5_6de7f51e7849@nysa.notmuch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 19:22:59 -0000 On 11/02/2013 09:08 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote: > Either way this doesn't make any sense to me. Each thread has a single origin > mail, why would anybody would like to show a message other than that while > displaying the summary of the tread? Even more, why isn't there an option to > fetch that information easily? It's entirely possible to make a message that has a References: header that includes message IDs from two different threads. For a message like this, there is not a single "origin mail", right? For threads that derive from this message, the whole thread has more than one origin. --dkg