Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53221431FBC for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:39:05 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aLk0z6fLBVOD for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:39:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from dottedmag.net (burger.dottedmag.net [212.75.37.82]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE82431FAE for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:39:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from vertex.dottedmag (unknown [91.197.127.125]) by dottedmag.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF09D8C025 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:39:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from dottedmag by vertex.dottedmag with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NDhMv-00063J-Le for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:38:57 +0600 From: Mikhail Gusarov To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org References: <1258938805-15961-1-git-send-email-dottedmag@dottedmag.net> <87aay9s3a8.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:38:49 +0600 In-Reply-To: <87aay9s3a8.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> (Carl Worth's message of "Thu, 26 Nov 2009 07:40:15 -0800") Message-ID: <878wdti6li.fsf@vertex.dottedmag> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Handle message renames in mail spool X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:39:05 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Twas brillig at 07:40:15 26.11.2009 UTC-08 when cworth@cworth.org did gyre = and gimble: CW> I *really* want this patch in, since I think a lot of current users CW> would really benefit from it. I only see one big problem with it: Did you test the performance hit caused by disabling mtime checks? =2D-=20 http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJLDq8aAAoJEJ0g9lA+M4iIX9cP/id6b9DwQapG3nSMG8s8j16T m8xpvyfTkGFk6UfL/byEMMEw+nCJYIdoEIeR3O24K4QxwZsXzo9Etwn1Uiw1goNe 24Y1REq8z2tVDvmFdWke2izp5AI/F6bxfWuUh+KE1h2Us432nEBMqyCkrC7DhyTx SMLvcH/EygwDoCgUKliAdr9QQmCZEg9dHJpo9BJUhjmBBB03yIepKBpIoXHAwXF8 czmCbN8twjtFsbhXT0B8MmFvJD+5eKS8V5hmHk3m/GMqg+Iv5N2lviwxGPNhcC8N tOOUozr+dpNCP8K/dTGJqPnLewmVoXgfT4vODHFgkblPOI/doxSmSGRxXNjBs7ZG yzD6lojGYLY4cgCT9zLt4BOWfhyhfgtpNMI0IJuz19B5EUYjMJ4efgtokY0/75mt 12Tdr1S1UZabNg3VxlqHbkxgjJi/xgQq5XrR8aPT552qt2YqL4OFQuxnACIXDtXl YTCpqvWJQGqeFBp5q1EsqKE32scUgdvujBE9OJiYvsrlbw++3B/BpcOXhjjJuV8r HxbtXovYUEn9FdE3Bm851vNiZdaUDTswwDVH4cZcw1F+SeJaRBdBFtxS01Nc1yjU EcxKXeVlUXRkdZIYa9Rkj38vnBwq1R9wi4rLdBTRus5AkIRt15d7Uld9PTFqRO6V +yr8OygqX47RPolfappW =AN8Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--