Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E1D431FBF; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:26:31 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OofP2Y00CdlF; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:26:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D74C431FAE; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:26:30 -0800 (PST) From: Carl Worth To: Jameson Graef Rollins , notmuch@notmuchmail.org In-Reply-To: <20091121230638.GA31999@finestructure.net> References: <20091121230638.GA31999@finestructure.net> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:26:18 +0100 Message-ID: <877htj2nit.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [notmuch] suggestion/request about notmuch config X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:26:31 -0000 On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:06:38 -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > Hi, folks. I just recently heard about notmuch and am very excited by > it. It looks like exactly what I've been waiting years for. Also > excited to see so much good development work happening. Hi Jamie, welcome to notmuch! > I would prefer to see all notmuch files and data in the same > directory, preferably: > > ~/.notmuch > > The config file could be: > > ~/.notmuch/config > > and the database could be: > > ~/.notmuch/db I suppose that's totally reasonable, (though I wouldn't abbreviate "database" to "db"). I think the only thing I'd miss is that I can currently point the config file to a different database, (which is usually just for testing.) And really, for that what I really want is a "-f" option to the notmuch command to make it read from a specified configuration file. So if I had that option then I don't think I'd mind this change at all. > Let me know what people think. Looking forward to working with > notmuch! And I'm looking forward to your contributions. Thanks again, -Carl