Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547F6431FB6 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 09:05:47 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KmuJJ-Ufk78F for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 09:05:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 803E3431FAF for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 09:05:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40]) by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ta8JT-0006op-O3; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 17:05:44 +0000 Received: from 93-97-24-31.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.24.31] helo=localhost) by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ta8JT-0003UQ-Cm; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 17:05:43 +0000 From: Mark Walters To: Peter Wang , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/18] insert: parse command-line tag operations In-Reply-To: <1343223767-9812-10-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com> References: <1343223767-9812-1-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com> <1343223767-9812-10-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+81~g9730584 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 17:05:42 +0000 Message-ID: <87r4nqq1sp.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Sender-Host-Address: 93.97.24.31 X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :) X-QM-Body-MD5: 097be4e91f00fec4afeec6e6003e71d1 (of first 20000 bytes) X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: - X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to determine if it is spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam. This message scored -1.8 points. Summary of the scoring: * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, * medium trust * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com) * 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 17:05:47 -0000 Hi On Wed, 25 Jul 2012, Peter Wang wrote: > Parse +tag and -tag on the 'insert' command-line. > Issue a warning about ambiguous -tag arguments which don't follow > +tag nor an explicit option list terminator. > --- > notmuch-insert.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/notmuch-insert.c b/notmuch-insert.c > index 4fb3ea3..6db03e3 100644 > --- a/notmuch-insert.c > +++ b/notmuch-insert.c > @@ -24,6 +24,11 @@ > #include > #include > > +typedef struct { > + const char *tag; > + notmuch_bool_t remove; > +} tag_operation_t; > + > static notmuch_bool_t > check_folder_name (const char *folder) > { > @@ -236,8 +241,11 @@ notmuch_insert_command (void *ctx, int argc, char *argv[]) > const char **new_tags; > size_t new_tags_length; > const char *folder = NULL; > + tag_operation_t *tag_ops; > + int tag_ops_count = 0; > char *maildir; > int opt_index; > + notmuch_bool_t warn_tag_rem; > notmuch_bool_t ret; > > notmuch_opt_desc_t options[] = { > @@ -253,6 +261,48 @@ notmuch_insert_command (void *ctx, int argc, char *argv[]) > return 1; > } > > + if (opt_index > 0 && strcmp (argv[opt_index - 1], "--") == 0) { > + warn_tag_rem = FALSE; > + } else { > + warn_tag_rem = TRUE; > + } > + > + /* Array of tagging operations (add or remove), terminated with an > + * empty element. */ > + tag_ops = talloc_array (ctx, tag_operation_t, argc - opt_index + 1); > + if (tag_ops == NULL) { > + fprintf (stderr, "Out of memory.\n"); > + return 1; > + } > + > + for (; opt_index < argc; opt_index++) { > + if (argv[opt_index][0] == '+') { > + tag_ops[tag_ops_count].tag = argv[opt_index] + 1; > + tag_ops[tag_ops_count].remove = FALSE; > + tag_ops_count++; > + warn_tag_rem = FALSE; > + } else if (argv[opt_index][0] == '-') { > + if (warn_tag_rem) { > + fprintf (stderr, > + "Warning: ambiguous argument treated as tag removal: %s\n", > + argv[opt_index]); > + } > + tag_ops[tag_ops_count].tag = argv[opt_index] + 1; > + tag_ops[tag_ops_count].remove = TRUE; > + tag_ops_count++; > + } else { > + break; > + } > + } I don't like the code duplication between this and notmuch-tag.c. In particular the two (now) differ on how they deal with malformed tags etc. Would it be possible to unify them? Best wishes Mark > + > + tag_ops[tag_ops_count].tag = NULL; > + > + if (opt_index != argc) { > + fprintf (stderr, "Error: bad argument to notmuch insert: %s\n", > + argv[opt_index]); > + return 1; > + } > + > config = notmuch_config_open (ctx, NULL, NULL); > if (config == NULL) > return 1; > -- > 1.7.4.4 > > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch