Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541E540D14D for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:05:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.89 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ORZPM+ya3JtE; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:05:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF49D40D148; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:05:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 73CAF254493; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:05:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Carl Worth To: Jameson Rollins , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: bug report: xapian error for message id with '..' In-Reply-To: <87pqv1u42q.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> References: <87y6g7zr6q.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87vdbbw67l.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87pqv1u42q.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3.1-90-g8071c5c (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:05:13 -0700 Message-ID: <87mxq5u3au.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 01:05:24 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:48:29 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:41:18 -0400, Jameson Rollins wrote: >=20 > > I also note here that notmuch is not returning an error, even though a > > Xapian exception occurred and the search failed. This is another > > important issue. I'm not sure if I should bring it up in a separate > > message or not. This goes back to the bug tracking issue. >=20 > A separate message would be preferred for me. I'm basically using tagged > messages to indicate open bugs, so I'm now stuck with being unable to > untag this thread until both of these issues are fixed. And that's not > ideal. I just resolved that problem by fixing the underlying bug. Thanks for the report. =2DCarl =2D-=20 carl.d.worth@intel.com --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFMwjTJ6JDdNq8qSWgRAp0eAKChO6YFKN94akyUOX826GnaPV1dtQCdFUDg rjrDvXcPousSiCZBLuLLoIg= =L5Nd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--