Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6BEC40BD9B for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:05:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.19 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.19 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=unavailable Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yHdvtVcGFKVd for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:05:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brinza.cc.columbia.edu (brinza.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.8]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4EF140BFDF for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:05:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from servo.finestructure.net (cpe-67-243-144-42.nyc.res.rr.com [67.243.144.42]) (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0) by brinza.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8LL5Fm5003765 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:05:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OyA1b-0002J0-Kb; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:05:15 -0400 From: Jameson Rollins To: Carl Worth , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: notmuch development In-Reply-To: <87k4men8gx.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> References: <87k4men8gx.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3.1-71-g426c96f (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:05:12 -0400 Message-ID: <87lj6ukdtj.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-No-Spam-Score: Local X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.8 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:05:32 -0000 --=-=-= On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:32:30 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > Also, if anyone has any suggestions for things that we could do to > improve things if I have to "disappear" again in the future, then I > would be happy to do what I can. Hey, Carl. The most obvious thing I can think of is delegating some lieutenants to handle processing patches. There definitely are some worthy candidates (who are kind of already doing this already). Even if they're not actually pushing patches into a canonical repo, they could at least vet in-coming patches and prep things for your review. If they could present you with branches that are potentially "ready to go" it might make things a lot easier for you, especially when you're in a crunch. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMmR4IAAoJEO00zqvie6q8LH8P/10Fr94pzR9ZVNLJMYSfgrdH 47oc4bk/muEQzvG+8CH4AvH40QJk+UMjXWboJG4KA19rd+E1xSq3wMO3hADevHlc +/uFnSE8AiomI1YskysqIozFVVdrquGDBkV0vtEuN4MlpGwvru2TOM3bQSTFraKO NnJKcc/lkLjgGrKKq6Pi2jSC+ZNsAMJZ/EXFhQpKcTEExtuCZepJJ3dtiXqLzEtd EYZTVugBc+hk2577hYh2ykcF4Sq64Lmijsr6QwR+8dxnNngyvEr/88x1wtHqA2fA 8zZzH7eEaV6xckt08BmWRlidOZ1GBOdaVEdn5daI/5FSEflR87nX3w98oYJoBQrQ E3jihPJrvopHp3Jx+jXNns4mtyZwOVq3D5560NWwE9KE7SlL51eQ6fWGHNFYiya4 QtTQMXXmfOFXQFKbt3+2y9arqeAS7DDcgGdN/u//BeMAjkx1elR3thhx7ZL8yiiL 7Ks0iw8q0Nc+rc2Jt36twJ97OOiFZrodpG2pu3HUnvw5VUbxOfvqMzpiHSyj5pLT +F79BxF8OG3QQDb8/SnKYjyPC1ia4xgJ7shjyshpsybw5Lkzk5cNMDRjNWQN1bJE xoTOTs3S7PRn/UfsLPbtmvpe48PR2w4XHGX74rs2XNmftYJHnSbjKM4h/20TZVAw 2ACh7dUfuMYZrluUYm7Q =G05N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--