Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7275D431FAF for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:36:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.29 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F5ABdMLvxWgb for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:36:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA647431FAE for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:36:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F8A66E0021; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:36:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new Received: from finestructure.net (unknown [76.89.193.65]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins) by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBBD66E00A8; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:36:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 86D9E45D; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:36:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Jameson Graef Rollins To: Jani Nikula , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] emacs: new mua mailto: URI handler In-Reply-To: <87wr5idprb.fsf@nikula.org> References: <1327865624-7673-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> <1327865624-7673-2-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> <87hawmyt8k.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87wr5idprb.fsf@nikula.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+122~g81f44b7 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:36:04 -0700 Message-ID: <87bomucaq3.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 20:36:12 -0000 --=-=-= On Sat, Apr 14 2012, Jani Nikula wrote: > I'm going through the review queue right now, tagging notmuch::stale any > patches that don't apply on master. I was just about to nmbug push stale > on this one (2/2). Is that in error? Care to verify? Yes, it is an error. This patch applies to master. Did you in fact verify that it doesn't? You should not be tagging patches stale if they in fact still apply to master. If they still need review or something else that's a different matter. Please don't mark things as stale if they are not. Obviously I still care about this patch, or I wouldn't have re-commented on it. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPid+0AAoJEO00zqvie6q8oxcQAKuTHoKdhb0WlVsOPDqeLiD/ KeKn5SQ0Hx/bEKq3m0VhJq27L6iS2eSrXiZimxOSody80XOV8ONjNj+bnX+e2cRx t+1ZojI+JgfzUElWH61Ngwun0XQwRvtCZ4cF7bFL+IZAkNs5bhBCMxmMMge7VatV VeeEvnXufpLFC4jbhYqQ7PP0Ufc8ypfsY0/eDyJq9y+2m1+PUzVN772/Vi/4uVQG VoSsz/H1rezbTAG9FSfh42tLgd4VbWLRvBWmZt4g3kATeGJrXVR4fFx3PbY3lseN E5CKXFgNGWqkJOVtLdpBcOVFWs4M/obA1+Ay5QArho2RjZqhjCNwXQZzgCEih4sZ Bu3JNNoBhPFrnjI1OWSHpRjkO6zMmT8c8DB5nFfXtqzfbsd+1CJIizqZ8QxMfItV 4QS1kklymZFTOXWxCFIDe/GQ68cX6pcW3eAQY0mAJE2iaxcfsMihHMdQ3sUz0iun qUgjzBo/h0kQBEV4ch3Grg4H+VVPG9GsJavs/Cnp0rD1klPj1pVPLgCuu1OOLQnJ XPVdZ+4icX+TbQbemrptYMU+5Fpx8+KOu96oZ1+7V8ptj0P4m+LUJ17eGNV0s+Ln IJhDAdFjrprBWlw1FDVkyJoWE7vUNR89AG1sik6im2JdJZWMgLab/83jfkX4eco0 R3Pe8ZwS2laWEHiDHWFY =cvRL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--