Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B241431FAF for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:57:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1O6p4Q-nTAOY for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:57:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E511431FAE for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:57:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by bkwj4 with SMTP id j4so3032bkw.26 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:57:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=ImMo1QS/r7/+19ZrUmSqvxkKaED3J5vdZ568MYwf1f0=; b=mtoVsraBruarecd1tJmeGxHPwrLE+9P2xbP7ZGfA3TAtRvan/z+kz8x0GN1FT7IddD Q+xqbKZdHYQ91+/1f80MdXBrFz25azC7KFtmwq7Db+N9Lh5Nv38uaE9FblBMFNE1Fi++ OIlmvdojNteLvojJA/Jy8bmqTFnPP+3FG3Yl7MBpcMmFcyxUAv+JKToFqnxb2mafgvzG 4r64Fj2HSaKKc7anX3qQNb9L4f+qo4r3W/+6h7Lt3tEbsjXlU2rHsoPxL4VD7GJcQw0E sElK0xliRbaJsgjdODq7G2DSNEMdVvEJ/AQzrLd1q9n5wpK68zuSul4Xd1twpdXclioI nc8g== Received: by 10.204.154.28 with SMTP id m28mr14546419bkw.102.1333058271489; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:57:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw4-fe50f800-253.dhcp.inet.fi. [84.248.80.253]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id jr13sm16493050bkb.14.2012.03.29.14.57.48 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:57:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Jani Nikula To: Jameson Graef Rollins , Mark Anderson , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: Goto command for existing search windows In-Reply-To: <87iphn40g7.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> References: <3wd1uod7px7.fsf@testarossa.amd.com> <3wdmx6z5rzx.fsf@testarossa.amd.com> <87iphn40g7.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+295~g780f284 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:57:44 +0300 Message-ID: <87vcln9ijr.fsf@nikula.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlqemXdKSaeidQMKA2GI6UGRN8e3lm76UafwqUpuy5+EyeYk/jQgqp5uSBjLPbaXcI9q9wu X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:57:57 -0000 On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:27:36 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29 2012, Mark Anderson wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 14:24:36 -0600, Mark Anderson wrote: > >> I was looking for a function which would find a buffer based on one of > >> my saved searches, and perform the search if it didn't exist. > >> > >> I've gotten it a bit closer, if I perform the search that matches a > >> saved search, then this routine will find it because of the magic in > >> notmuch-search-buffer-title, but perhaps someone else feels up to > >> searching through the saved searches directly? > > Hey, Mark. I think you can be a little simpler. The title for search > buffers is based on the search, so a buffer will always be reused for an > identical search. You don't need to do any fancy buffer searching. Hi, I believe Mark's point was just switching to the buffer if it exists, *without* refreshing or doing the query, and only doing regular notmuch-search if a buffer doesn't exist yet. BR, Jani.