Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28868431FBC for ; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 10:12:01 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4LukHbduQhK9 for ; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 10:11:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14C51431FB6 for ; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 10:11:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y7TB4-0008UD-C9; Sat, 03 Jan 2015 14:11:54 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 26578 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 03 Jan 2015 18:11:49 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Tomi Ollila Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: Allow rst2man.py as an alternative to rst2man In-Reply-To: References: <1420294479-27224-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi> <1420300167-5060-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> <20150103164506.GR14967@odin.tremily.us> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+10~g215de26 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 19:11:49 +0100 Message-ID: <87tx07wx7e.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 18:12:01 -0000 Tomi Ollila writes: > I'd presume anyone else using such an old system will have bigger > problems getting their notmuch compiled (recent enough zlib being one > of those), so this makes me wonder whether there is actually anyone > needing rst2man there (besides me, of course :) I guess the original reasoning was that rst2man was part of python/docutils and so more likely to already be available. d