Return-Path: <chm.duquesne@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3173E431FB6
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 01:52:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.699
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 6-LeeR1NBQcJ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Fri, 14 Sep 2012 01:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com (mail-ie0-f181.google.com
	[209.85.223.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D195B431FAE
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 01:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ieak12 with SMTP id k12so6730954iea.26
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 01:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=FhifCzkHN9oH4QPDNxRjupCtPmUQl1w/YwmH01DcnA4=;
	b=Skx9w7gJOv5jCBJ4UyvMxdobW4aS/MghmdAjdwRKZeOhnKfchL6sz0KqkETwz8vXBR
	X0j4zTubrzQpQ/7C8tHlSMTyaL2zLTzqbvxreeFwcg8UBxFZm0d+t7XJND1ywvQbaQks
	m9bxdtn35h8Cco0If6nAshEaleGutalDTpJnF0C0Kg7pyrwCa9GlE6rs204XtLRsvNFh
	6R6Rpl9bqC++p/Z9AL670NY9gI+wnngg+qSsnaODK3XGrJb7XcGQJjNmcYsGspOUrXwo
	U2c+O7+j/mhylcYCewhtzo5TfDBq0YXhWbx/ykTXoKuYIn2JZilvIIBhdAOAa2LDV7JM
	MwOg==
Received: by 10.50.195.194 with SMTP id ig2mr27887199igc.24.1347612760209;
	Fri, 14 Sep 2012 01:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: chm.duquesne@gmail.com
Received: by 10.64.24.9 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 01:52:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5052ECBC.30203@gmail.com>
References:
 <CA+y5gghe68Sy6BK8FdeGbKEESFD_=2GQ+y+oZSYyt85oQqRuzA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+eQo_0nK1rL6DYu2ERqF3U=vZAO_XTpXDtzydHQqBtXqHUOxQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+y5gghnzinnXiabFOEphAuWTJA5Uge9RtGbKu9ur5rP50i_5g@mail.gmail.com>
	<5052E1A9.8060503@gmail.com>
	<CAHLp1YkRfM9NGB9di9jMNwJbY1sFFjfUw1z8ZSCJ7e4Hz_3q0g@mail.gmail.com>
	<5052ECBC.30203@gmail.com>
From: Christophe-Marie Duquesne <chmd@chmd.fr>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:52:19 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: L-SvnKGae6oW0nX4WZWOz81L398
Message-ID:
 <CAHLp1Yn-wP+=R0otkEPWpDN6M_dq21SrwLTRnkLYtUdiT2YYsA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Better Gmail handling by not using Notmuch tags
To: Rainer M Krug <R.M.Krug@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org,Jeremy Nickurak	<public-
public-not-much-kexSNQTsIoD754YsiR0rpA-wOFGN7rlS/M9smdsby/KFg@plane.gmane.org>
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 08:52:41 -0000

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Rainer M Krug <R.M.Krug@gmail.com> wrote:
> An API seems to be the way to go, but that one only concerns the settings, not retrieving
> information about individual emails.

Oops. It seems that I misread that.

> But that is definetly a job for somebody else - I am just throwing ideas out.

It was a general "you".