Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350E1429E34 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:34:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pBjEZzZzxhwl for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:34:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru-group.fi [87.108.86.66]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E3F431E64 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:34:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7712068056; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:34:40 +0200 (EET) From: Tomi Ollila To: David Edmondson , Jameson Graef Rollins , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Move the blank line from the bottom of the headers to the top of the body. In-Reply-To: References: <1327942340-23340-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org> <87obtk30lc.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+146~geb6dc33 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:34:42 -0000 On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:32:12 +0000, David Edmondson wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:25:19 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:52:20 +0000, David Edmondson wrote: > > > The blank line doesn't really change position, but is now considered > > > to be part of the body rather than part of the headers. This means > > > that it is visible when the body is visible rather than when the > > > headers are visible. > > > > This definitely makes sense. I rarely hide headers anymore, but I never > > liked that the separation between the headers and the body went away > > when the headers are hidden. +1. > > Any objections to changing this? +1 for changing this. Tomi