Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DDCF4196F2 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:47:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.8 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=unavailable Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0MGhy90Ma-hE for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:47:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69EB8431FC1 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:47:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=x200.gr8dns.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1O5iWI-0004Xh-Cj; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 16:47:54 +0000 Received: by x200.gr8dns.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id B68EECC591; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:47:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Dirk Hohndel To: Carl Worth , notmuch Subject: Re: [PATCH] removed unused variables In-Reply-To: <87zl0tmzyq.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> References: <87zl0tmzyq.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2-187-g7c5f017 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:47:53 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 16:47:57 -0000 On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:55:09 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:26:46 -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > > > trivial compiler warning fix > > Thanks. I finally caught up to this. > > I had seen this patch from you earlier, when I didn't have a convenient > working-directory for just applying it---so I've been religiously > ignoring those warnings ever since rather than just fixing them. ;-) This is something that I got caught in last night. I have brought in more patches from others, worked on my own patches, and suddenly I got stuck in git-branch-hell and couldn't figure out how to move changes from one branch to another. That's why my reply-guessing-segfault fix is not relative to my last patch... I'm trying to clean up my mess this morning :-) /D