From: Thomas Jost <schnouki@schnouki.net>
To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, Stewart Smith <stewart@flamingspork.com>,
	notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Allow user to choose "From" address when composing
	a new message.
In-Reply-To: <87r57ma0im.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
References: <87vcxb0za4.fsf@flamingspork.com>
	<87wrhfvk6a.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<87lixvvjty.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<87lixu7w71.fsf@thor.loria.fr>
	<87r57ma0im.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-216-g0154922 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 10:39:58 +0200
Message-ID: <87hb8hlush.fsf@thor.loria.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Precedence: list

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 25 May 2011 15:17:05 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
> > I'll also send a few additional patches that make it possible to choose
> > the "From" address when forwarding a message and when replying to a
> > message.
>=20
> The only real concern I have with the series is that it grabs 'R' for
> reply-with-custom-from where I've been planning to implement 'R' as
> reply-to-sender-only, (a long-missing and often-requested feature).

That would be nice indeed :)

> When I first started implementing the custom-from feature I planned to
> use a prefix argument to get the behavior (such as "C-u m" rather than
> "M" for compose-new-mail-with-custom-from). You might even see I've got
> some code written along those lines.

Good idea, this will probably seem more natural for Emacs users.

> When I went to test it though, it didn't work. That was probably some
> silly mistake on my part, (we do already have working code that changes
> behavior with a prefix argument in the case of "M-RET" for example).
>=20
> If you want to update the series to move away from capital-letter
> keybindings in favor of a prefix argument, I'll be glad to accept it.

Done and tested locally, seems OK so far. This makes the code smaller
and IMHO nicer because it eliminates all the -prompt-for-sender
variants. I'll send the updated patch series very soon.

Thanks,

=2D-=20
Thomas/Schnouki

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJN3hHfAAoJEMPdciX+bh5IKcMH/iVl5SLkvfvE7yqt7K2lNyA3
6ZFFDkwmqcLVVXtXHQYAcsmopiqx+4hebtostZo5CoNv5AUQFq0Xo5jDEz7NoSQa
9pbb6epp86Dn0tqtN9c8rbVj7Y8mpeAzp+g6ySSoNv1H8TiP786C8JKhvRs9UGDQ
4TstwCYEze9tDH9dnQKJbAjQARiqTGSC+qGtvl0KQMuT3z5M6eA7G3HJocYzG5b6
0L3IDRA1i0aML9A+TYzRnS3bOMVQLjYM1d7hhOH6je3LXRoPhhbEXUyl0UW5rTFj
Iv9W60oYactIJlEI5R/6P+uF93sTtt/BrOJkIQyVK6rJMYvEi1B5C+wCc8pxpxU=
=It7C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--