Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C89E40DBC0 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 15:13:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h2b7QsKB8BdI for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 15:13:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (smtp3-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.3]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6832A40DDC8 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 15:13:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from racin (unknown [82.239.207.166]) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C298A6108; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 00:13:26 +0100 (CET) From: Matthieu Lemerre To: Sebastian Spaeth , Darren McGuicken , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] How to improve the mail handling workflow? In-Reply-To: <871v6n8u8h.fsf@SSpaeth.de> References: <87fwv65zw1.fsf@free.fr> <87sjz6ft52.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info> <87d3qa5wl1.fsf@free.fr> <871v6n8u8h.fsf@SSpaeth.de> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 00:25:44 +0100 Message-ID: <87lj4vij2f.fsf@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 23:13:45 -0000 On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:34:38 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:35:22 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote: > > But the space bar removes the unread tag, so I do not see how it > > helps... By default, hitting the space bar throughout a thread would > > remove every tag from the thread, so you keep asking "where was the mail > > in my inbox that I have read and I can't find anymore?" > > If you accidentally switch to the next thread, it's very easy to just > hit 'q' to get back to the initial search and go one message up to get > to the message you just left. I'd rather not remove the inbox tag from the thread in the first place. Matthieu