Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507D7431FBC for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 17:32:56 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ghqxrBecT++i for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 17:32:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.59.211]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A48431FAF for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 17:32:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from omta18.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.90]) by QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id N0TE1n0031wpRvQ5B1YqNP; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 01:32:50 +0000 Received: from odin.tremily.us ([24.18.63.50]) by omta18.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id N1Yn1n00d152l3L3e1YoUV; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 01:32:49 +0000 Received: by odin.tremily.us (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 954F3FC9E3B; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 17:32:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tremily.us; s=odin; t=1391477566; bh=WeLlxAVN93p+iapUMyRiysqEv7M+ZE0B7f3vLuiW9RU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=jTvFYfGWI9vUf8qyvc4DRytG0vQ9Mdjsrx85yWxE2q5HrjTI4CfGKfyUdV3cBYAwx THxrXzcOlnOikjLA2SYPKcp7669YbOkfEU3TUKOrucWI4AKyBMo6VYZFkTwzXYTiDy uYOaf9dD2Wc3CK/ehVCGbDFNNMCG7BY2gxBf7k8o= Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 17:32:46 -0800 From: "W. Trevor King" To: Mark Walters Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] emacs: Prefer Content-Description over filename for part buttons Message-ID: <20140204013246.GQ19935@odin.tremily.us> References: <877g9chbay.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <27be295875a7df782a83c9a2c09d06f9d321fe9e.1391423201.git.wking@tremily.us> <87vbwwosuw.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <20140203203418.GO14197@odin.tremily.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="K5roPakIqCb4O6y8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140203203418.GO14197@odin.tremily.us> OpenPGP: id=39A2F3FA2AB17E5D8764F388FC29BDCDF15F5BE8; url=http://tremily.us/pubkey.txt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1391477570; bh=apngPsN+8cqGL4B+Qfw3yj25+g5sj2NyKavH/aNQoNg=; h=Received:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nro6eT4ljU7S2yA8lLgtGOGno6hFDKwc8IrJf3fN2FhkBfRsDYzu+LjMXrpzvTo/W EwN4fvc37LLp+cjIYdWYc+G8mKtPJZrNUau0am51FlkBdza2P3Hn7EE7t2GIoK20yt Hkcap/oUsKT8IaQLCSSq+h7ScdlA1mojn7iPlqiY6TzGYxPK8Zhcvh1n9IQv9P/uSx AV3hq0/Ess9fbzAsBUUlWEDgqwd0Pkx6w8yhG+T5OdjhUpUv3DYF7DqHjBiRmU/6Uz nxgzjZcXwiNQnOptI0nP7Ta5KQp+sN4P2qqnOog8SVi5lW30Vq+id5xfnWjc+b5B5S O8Eps2og6dsYA== Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 01:32:56 -0000 --K5roPakIqCb4O6y8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 12:34:18PM -0800, W. Trevor King wrote: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 08:15:35PM +0000, Mark Walters wrote: > > I think we should only display/use the content-description if it > > exists and is non-empty. >=20 > Sounds good to me. I'll queue this and a test for v2. Rather than patching this in Emacs, maybe we should collapse the =E2=80=9Cn= ot set=E2=80=9D and =E2=80=9Cset to empty string=E2=80=9D cases in notmuch-sho= w.c? I can't think of any reasons why someone would want to distinguish those two cases, and it's easier all around if we standardize the representation as far upstream as possible. Thoughts? Trevor --=20 This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy --K5roPakIqCb4O6y8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS8EM7AAoJEKKfehoaNkbtew0P/juotuhPEbeWiWFDEsFBEOYW JthvNYOrys7f4+3NVTBBAj5y442O0NX+WLU7cfiXV2Oe6+hNBrxDYew8ujURGWbe 2kxImvenH80N7ozfg3UZzSNDnURayl4EVUvSjFVFuJod3dNq98CaZZd4HmFn/U+3 mUPUAkTIUt/XqOZgsOIZaWOA6GzYPBLr0W+Pkg/tcdv8eJyGTEPABNK4rY4klNMn sm8Bqk2V2lIaUO5jSJc/H46dx89H3S5BG61/S5uu2F6h7M0wScqv0kAzE2BG6tNc PpWcvcI4rOKvnor/T/HlwH9iCG1Xi0+FpdfTgSbkKTZUclAbqjouuKk6PAHwMqsj 4pbfRWq6YdLGWyby2F+vbdb4j24jmPbDPTUPGb3F9Z6uhTCFoFoAxNIwJxrJ97qX oLmHx9iQMH1g+2i2ESMD8/503Pp7i8c2MaYkdyI4kQH/7Tdul/KVS8Sf2Wuk7806 0FLeOdAmu/g9pKoi+WZ+jQZTj5rK04d9vcVAgtVkIw/DPyiO2mp/iWG0+MbvV1pm 8ZXT0E2bBrDdwMC5j1HMNWCgHMneeToQ/HjzN2IYOyeTQNIvf9wpHS9HZXNKjHzc JCJdvBgDQlO6uw60DBLfSp7lZAvfwPnm8b4ZbxGYfLfLcipeRXpGgECiUU0r4ya7 l+MiTH66eCrkBFFnOD+c =cqTU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --K5roPakIqCb4O6y8--