Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6576DE0C81 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 05:21:07 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.31 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.31 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.241, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.55, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14Dt1nCzJUlI for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 05:21:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B90DD6DE0C4A for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 05:21:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aHAUm-0004Dw-Ra; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 08:20:52 -0500 Received: (nullmailer pid 15838 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 07 Jan 2016 13:20:59 -0000 From: David Bremner To: "W. Trevor King" , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] nmbug-status: Adjust headers to start with h1 In-Reply-To: <4691cbb60322873d2a068ed991cde940d090492a.1451509249.git.wking@tremily.us> References: <4691cbb60322873d2a068ed991cde940d090492a.1451509249.git.wking@tremily.us> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+26~g9404723 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 09:20:59 -0400 Message-ID: <87k2nl8r0k.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 13:21:07 -0000 "W. Trevor King" writes: > We've been leading off with h2s since 3e5fb88f (contrib/nmbug: add > nmbug-status script, 2012-07-07), but the semantically-correct headers > are: > >

{title}

> ... >

Views

> ... >

View 1

> ... >

View 2

> ... > > We can always add additional CSS if the default h1 formatting is too > intense. I'm pretty sure it will be, at least for me, since that's the reason I did it this way in the first place. I'm (obviously) not a web person, how about providing some CSS to roughly duplicate the current visuals? d