To: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>, notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] v2 [RFC] emacs: merge overhauled
	`notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers' into `notmuch'
In-Reply-To: <87obu19pfo.fsf@praet.org>
References: <87r4yza95m.fsf@praet.org>
	<1326732415-21894-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org>
	<cun39bftw9b.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
	<87fwfd8h0i.fsf@praet.org>
	<cunk44pmi7k.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
	<87obu19pfo.fsf@praet.org>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+64~g42e8f66 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.92.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:57:53 +0000
Message-ID: <cunhaztmalq.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Precedence: list

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:15:55 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:13:35 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:03:09 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wro=
te:
> > > > [...] What's wrong with '(loop ... collect ...)'?
> > >=20
> > > Nothing at all.  I was fixing my own patch [1] without resorting to
> > > requiring the `cl' package at runtime :)  Would be nice if we could
> > > get rid of the compile-time dependency as well, though.
> >=20
> > Can you explain why it's necessary at runtime?
>=20
> Because otherwise `remove-if-not' and `member-if-not' would
> be void, as you alluded to previously [1,2].

Ah, not macros. Sorry for being slow.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk8WwdEACgkQaezQq/BJZRabSQCfb6IHwqnpyDjOD0Nxs8c7XnVg
E44An0LkfZJADFlDU6fH4qwuPACmGlq5
=dBP1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--