Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085E5429E4E for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 13:36:49 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZhQ8HMPfNr3P for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 13:36:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ee0-f51.google.com (mail-ee0-f51.google.com [74.125.83.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 553EE429E4D for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 13:36:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ee0-f51.google.com with SMTP id t10so745622eei.10 for ; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 13:36:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=EdylY+t76CvvfT/DeghEo2ovguyLmeT6kSqtZ634tc4=; b=X7qc93QVqB6ExArJphuZL/drSzTqlMzhzEZKZYmekwkkW34B9rcbX5/3xt3hYe+n/N 4r4zX1bywkSWUbTS03S5C/DNmIq/UiUKVcv+TaLzzAlqVtPZ/qCHU49onojxgv+9xZ/X aQZ/gJtQahv9ibZZdy5UixgSEHm5SjQybkXU1UAtntUBEbYkY9FxBzehq+L7fRxeEAPi ZPMXfg1Hn6U2U3XLm71IPQ/lH9APr+QZujkTVdnXmxPQ58kZ96z6Ae2YNLx8csTgZqO7 6RgewxmWeO/v4QAbl5o4o66XT+UAVSFB2tzVsY9ApwpY9G9UnlVEE/f6eOaqrvpJR3Cx a6gQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQll2wIbWQSaroVU9+LuDO8tbjqxs8Cn/YZJ0XU5390nZvtablJPBYBWoc3SYzV+uoF8nopr X-Received: by 10.14.48.14 with SMTP id u14mr1426044eeb.74.1383514133348; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 13:28:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw2-58c36f-91.dhcp.inet.fi. [88.195.111.91]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d7sm38023768eem.8.2013.11.03.13.28.51 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 03 Nov 2013 13:28:52 -0800 (PST) From: Jani Nikula To: Jesse Rosenthal , Felipe Contreras , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Getting the right root mail of the thread In-Reply-To: <87k3gprzo0.fsf@jhu.edu> References: <5274f93e254b5_6de7f51e7849@nysa.notmuch> <87zjpmoqtz.fsf@nikula.org> <87k3gprzo0.fsf@jhu.edu> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.16+120~gfd733a4 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 23:28:51 +0200 Message-ID: <87k3gpyy24.fsf@nikula.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 21:36:49 -0000 On Sun, 03 Nov 2013, Jesse Rosenthal wrote: > The current behavior can be annoying, but the old behavior could make > the MUA quite unusable in a number of circumstances. (And yes, an MUA > that fails on reading mail from senders with bad emailing practices is > unusable for me.) I wouldn't have suggested changing the current default behaviour anyway, but thanks for reminding us there are users depending on it! > Maybe there should be a "show original subject" toggle? That wouldn't be > too hard, though it would require another call to the library and > regenerating the search results. IMO the best approach would be including the first (or oldest, or original) subject in the structured thread summary output, in addition to the first matching subject that we have now. BR, Jani.