Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A11A431FAF for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:57:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q-Nayx-pe2Kz for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:57:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [209.234.253.108]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89B4431FAE for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:57:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.13.75] (lair.fifthhorseman.net [108.58.6.98]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E7B1F975; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:57:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4F9810E5.5070402@fifthhorseman.net> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:57:41 -0400 From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120329 Icedove/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Bremner Subject: Re: priorities for 0.13 References: <878vhkvvqi.fsf@zancas.localnet> In-Reply-To: <878vhkvvqi.fsf@zancas.localnet> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig73015259C450CC4873E0E7C1" Cc: notmuch X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:57:51 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig73015259C450CC4873E0E7C1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/25/2012 08:31 AM, David Bremner wrote: > I'd like to have a feature freeze for 0.13 sometime in the first week o= f > May. What do people feel are priorities to try to get reviewed and > pushed for 0.13? I'd love it if Someone=E2=84=A2 would get S/MIME implemented, tested, and= reviewed, but it certainly won't be me before the first week of May. --dkg --------------enig73015259C450CC4873E0E7C1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJPmBDlXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQwRUU1QkU5NzkyODJEODBCOUY3NTQwRjFD Q0QyRUQ5NEQyMTczOUU5AAoJEMzS7ZTSFznpaDoP+wVoviqB8mvQZq67ijnsGgCM jLOxrQifAbRH8xza4RDmTrcdfwzk3wOGpk6yQczMiKrw31xUMr12XdCIsQBT3P9I Pa2Pjou7GsOl95OdhstIipWQSQKR2rArA5NB4ix5wSv49+0CATD9FV/EbDNe+Up5 TlBBYZ6gMXvHVWHPVo/Yvvql1qkH559fd1101RDePYuA5rMkv07dkyQhOi7MhUWL 4q4/RHBKLNinq0pomKWlYdTwky5l99IFMN5RJGYpWDFYdK3115bmJUm65p+WZ6qG HxoB+FGmow27ek7zkoKBdNg0OBfuMEx1lJi3Mg+sROI9FlFaqHgicwrRKYkAm5xT Q+MIS3n0QWIW4egV6uIp7kqYGjtTQL/yMdmFxfkeynPFNGHxjC0prNeE37M+ByIF OE+VRGPfuWU+LodEIlzDSj62MIL1C7x68JZS6d0EzNtnjPKaXPgL7eNM5NhtHrzy F0nHMwFwa4Swzg2ECYyUnV1mdjTYvrYXeDlOPB7WUd+RbpWWwexD+d4PDmiRQyvf UKxKhqhrKBV+J8LOA42hLiSXx3dN5oEceIB6grPncZ8DnagovgTj/p4UK9ojFg94 cyey3cLXHWi0b2CB5iFgt9zDSSzFwBjlMcsj5xhj8pezVLcHul5amYQ+BRPEOU/m RwqakoCJ0rMzNQSBFebk =KNz6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig73015259C450CC4873E0E7C1--