From: Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com>
To: David Bremner <bremner@debian.org>
Subject: Re: More ideas about logging.
In-Reply-To: <87hb10encm.fsf@zancas.localnet>
References: <87obv9i7y3.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87obv9vvdo.fsf@canonical.com>
	<87hb10encm.fsf@zancas.localnet>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:53:50 +1300
Message-ID: <87ipldwnpt.fsf@canonical.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Precedence: list

On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 08:02:17 -0400, David Bremner <bremner@debian.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:16:51 +1300, Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> wrote:
> > 
> > It's a tangent, but would this sort of thing allow a "undo last tagging
> > operation" command in emacs?
> > 
> 
> It seems like it would be much simpler to track that information in a
> data structure in emacs?

I think that would require tracking more information than is currently
tracked -- when press 'a' on a thread, emacs would have to remember
which emails had the inbox tag before running 'notmuch tag -inbox
thread:xxx' or whatever it runs today.

You are probably right that what you're talking about here is not the
easiest way to do this though.

Cheers,
mwh