DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:bcc:references:date:message-id
	:mime-version:content-type;
	b=QBpb99N9e50jfVUxOHkweYL5EyjozXgVVZ3D92uNfvLz6Xs1hxeiefyO58vUer6XWP
	jy4asKsvjzgI86QDHPA7LI3R8ra7OOZTmhQWyDjoo3HpmbNDgjgbVcbjV1hwYjEGqiGG
	fR2hxkoAIBSk12s6ni/tuvmchK/WA5nZf98CM=
From: Alex Ghitza <aghitza@gmail.com>
To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>, Marten Veldthuis
	<marten@veldthuis.com>
In-Reply-To: <20091220183113.GA4482@finestructure.net>
References: <54hbrnpod1.fsf@gmail.com> <8763836xnv.fsf@59A2.org>
	<54hbrmze3v.fsf@gmail.com> <87aaxextev.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<yunljgye4uu.fsf@aiko.keithp.com> <54eimqz2sk.fsf@gmail.com>
	<yuneimqdyqt.fsf@aiko.keithp.com> <87ws0hjyio.fsf@veldthuis.com>
	<20091220183113.GA4482@finestructure.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:57:40 +1100
Message-ID: <54iqc0wsx7.fsf@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [notmuch] keeping a copy of sent mail locally
Precedence: list

On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:31:13 -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
> Hi, folks.  I've been following this thread a bit and I wanted to put
> in my argument that using Bcc is *NOT* the way to save local copies of
> sent mail.  I really don't think that we need to require that the mail
> actually get send out to the world wide net just to save a copy of it
> locally.  I think there must be better ways of doing this.

Agreed, and I think that directly saving to a file is the sane way to
go.  However, there might be other (more legitimate) uses for always
bcc-ing a certain address on all sent mail, and it might be good to have
an easy mechanism for this.  


Best,
Alex

-- 
Alex Ghitza -- Lecturer in Mathematics -- The University of Melbourne
-- Australia -- http://www.ms.unimelb.edu.au/~aghitza/