Return-Path: <ingmar@exherbo.org>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A2A4048D2
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:43:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.472
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.472 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[AWL=-0.287, BAYES_40=-0.185] autolearn=ham
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id MKLNU2kwGKT4 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:43:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bach.exherbo.org (bach.exherbo.org [78.47.197.147])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0694048D1
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:43:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [83.101.72.69] (helo=localhost)
	by bach.exherbo.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <ingmar@exherbo.org>)
	id 1Nq713-0005pj-Uo; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:43:10 +0000
To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
In-Reply-To: 874okltwgk.fsf@SSpaeth.de
Message-Id: <E1Nq713-0005pj-Uo@bach.exherbo.org>
From: ingmar@exherbo.org
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:43:10 +0000
Subject: Re: [notmuch] (no subject)
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:43:11 -0000

> Ben Gamaris original patch gives me an "-lnotmuch" not found failure
> during compilation.
> Your patchset compiles fine and installs /usr/local/bin/notmuch and
> /usr/local/lib/libnotmuch.so.1. However, it doesn't find it when running
> and exits saying libnotmuch.so not found.

Right, that was the error the second patch fixes. Sorry, honestly couldn't
remember, thanks for testing!

> I don't know anything about LD_LIBRARY_PATH and friends, but using the
> default Makefile options (which use /usr/local as prefix) a standard
> install should still work :-).

What's the value of LDPATH in your environment? It should contain /usr/local/lib.
If it doesn't that's not an issue with the patch, but with your installation/distro
afaik.