Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168FB431FB6 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 11:55:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UJQcGPWDr0cg for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 11:55:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-4.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-4.mit.edu [18.9.25.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC515431FAE for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 11:55:13 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 1209190f-f79f86d0000061c8-85-53dbe28ff1a4 Received: from mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.35]) (using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-4.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 96.74.25032.F82EBD35; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 14:55:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id s71It9oC004322; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 14:55:09 -0400 Received: from awakening.csail.mit.edu (awakening.csail.mit.edu [18.26.4.91]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as amdragon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id s71It6sD003929 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 1 Aug 2014 14:55:07 -0400 Received: from amthrax by awakening.csail.mit.edu with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XDHyr-0006oX-To; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 14:55:05 -0400 Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 14:55:05 -0400 From: Austin Clements To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add configurable changed tag to messages that have been changed on disk Message-ID: <20140801185505.GS13893@mit.edu> References: <1396800683-9164-1-git-send-email-eg@gaute.vetsj.com> <87fviiiuzn.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrFKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixCmqrNv/6Hawwb3fahY3WrsZLbZ2vGC2 aPp8idXi+s2ZzBb7+v0dWD1+/Gtm83i26hazx5RZc9k9+r9cY/fYcug9cwBrFJdNSmpOZllq kb5dAlfGwUNnWQtaxCrmLZ3G2sB4X6CLkZNDQsBEYt3C/6wQtpjEhXvr2boYuTiEBGYzSbyb 94gRwtnAKNG34hZU5hSTxLnrr1khnCWMEgv/fWEG6WcRUJGY9uUW2Cw2AQ2JbfuXM4LYIgLS EjvvzgaLMwssZZSY2CMPYgsLxElMu7yDCcTmFdCRuLj4Ozvcus3TetggEoISJ2c+YYFo1pHY ufUOUJwDyJaWWP6PAyIsL9G8dTbYDZwCgRLHNmwCs0WB7plychvbBEbhWUgmzUIyaRbCpFlI Ji1gZFnFKJuSW6Wbm5iZU5yarFucnJiXl1qka6KXm1mil5pSuokRHEWS/DsYvx1UOsQowMGo xMNrsO92sBBrYllxZe4hRkkOJiVRXrOHQCG+pPyUyozE4oz4otKc1OJDjBIczEoivNu2AeV4 UxIrq1KL8mFS0hwsSuK8b62tgoUE0hNLUrNTUwtSi2CyMhwcShK8DMBkISRYlJqeWpGWmVOC kGbi4AQZzgM0fBrIYt7igsTc4sx0iPwpRkUpcd6tD4ASAiCJjNI8uF5YknvFKA70ijDvJZB2 HmCChOt+BTSYCWhwjSHY4JJEhJRUA2PWXi3zP8f6N1ier47ukUuN0OTt+Vf0LUWLx1L3m0LS hrZDmlv+MtieO/xW9GihY62mNe+svfp9xxSnvOcUl57ScH3qpWX7HhtoKui4sSvNMhQXc1+i NVnIXGGfAQvrtGNnhPymz+n98SWSy3nd/qVf8/09Km+XVZWVNdUqvLvj8pxxotWiY0osxRmJ hlrMRcWJAO+IU5lNAwAA X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 18:55:22 -0000 I have a prototype implementation of message modification times on my lastmod-v1 branch at https://github.com/aclements/notmuch/tree/lastmod-v1 It builds on my database features series that's currently awaiting review [1]. The series uses a monotonic revision number, rather than wall-clock time, for reasons related to Xapian's concurrent control and detailed in the main commit's commit message. The implementation isn't quite useful from the CLI yet because I haven't added any way to query the database's current revision number. (I'm still thinking about how I want to do this, since search/show don't have a good way to deliver "additional" information right now. I might just add the last modification for each individual message/max of all messages in a thread, similar to what Thomas Jost's patch did long ago.) [1] id:1406859003-11561-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu Quoth Gaute Hope on Jul 28 at 4:37 pm: > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:42 PM, David Bremner <[1]david@tethera.net> > wrote: > > Gaute Hope <[2]eg@gaute.vetsj.com> writes: > > > When one of the source files for a message is changed on disk, > renamed, > > deleted or a new source file is added. A configurable changed tag is > > is added. The tag can be configured under the option 'changed_tags' in > > the [new] section, the default is none. Tests have been updated to > > accept the new config option. > > > > notmuch-setup now asks for a changed tag after the new tags question. > > > > This could be useful for for example 'afew' to detect remote changes > in > > IMAP folders and update the FolderNameFilter to also add tags or > remove > > tags when a _existing_ message has been added to or removed from a > > maildir. > > The discussion on this proposal seems to have died out without reaching > a conclusion. David M expressed a strong preference for some kind of > modification time field in the database.  Gaute agreed with some caveats > that such an approach could solve his problems as well. On the other > hand, nobody seems to be actually working on such an approach at the > moment.  Gaute and or David do you have any interest in revisiting the > series [3]id:1323796305-28789-1-git-send-email-schnouki@schnouki.net and > seeing if it can be reworked into mergeable shape? I suspect in > particular something needs to be added with respect to message deletion > Thomas, are you still running some variant of these patches? > d > > I am afraid I don't have the chance to put in any consistent effort on > this at the moment. > > I agree, message deletion needs to be solved somehow. > Regards, Gaute