Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29E76DE1962 for ; Mon, 4 May 2015 01:53:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.313 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.313 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.313] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bl_JbJyIsC5f for ; Mon, 4 May 2015 01:53:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E50516DE1950 for ; Mon, 4 May 2015 01:53:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YpC7w-0002HR-4d; Mon, 04 May 2015 08:53:24 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 18913 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 04 May 2015 08:53:15 -0000 From: David Bremner To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: feature freeze for notmuch 0.20 In-Reply-To: <874moi71p1.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> References: <874moi71p1.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20~rc1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 10:53:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87k2woafly.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 08:53:58 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain David Bremner writes: > It's been too long since we had a notmuch release. I'd like to feature > freeze May 1 and release by May 15. As usual feel free to tag things in > the review queue as notmuch::0.20, although you may also consider > reviewing them if you feel strongly that they should be in 0.20. OK, after an unusually quiet pre-freeze time, I've tagged 0.20_rc1 and uploaded it to Debian experimental. We still need to sort out NEWS, at least. d --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQGcBAEBCAAGBQJVRzN6AAoJEPIClx2kp54sm3IL/3SrTzCNERNY+nfPBqFJyf4E 1I/EAjzsI5ZaZEyDQeTsdIr3TWwYVIC+iUCClOQ/KNiwxzA2e8kXnhIb1RzOtFWW qzE7h6g2waPxuYU5LMyDHmQMzslcd/VRw0WOXE5FF8czFY0xu4m8PrgBGNqiKJWa eoGyRwzFA0KeL66ZcwjO5J3E56PFN549P2TIQkAUdJLP5XmOXLJP8vZ8ZTKSOgSt DALTAxt/fhawKkyw5kFVT1GgSGOVkN2HMr2wQzoaaR3pdL+jqnv8gVxHCT8XPKb+ 80lZlaRwg+orQRPROt5OGTeTgkHh/3PXqH7v76QANUTHVkdEsUbkmdCSqIY4m/yM 97mZ/vM1tpCbSccQTkNdWYSbdVKKCC0Lst4ZHQYVxt4rYUx5tTmB9WVWO7OrgVO/ lJI1TA6zcCQt2U7XufarBz7at/T06SXEf2h8Ndargn3Ad4YLCL+QzgSimvavdP7c 22RCGMRpx4PyX5dpWrTTssblfwkT+BiDloK74k4q7Q== =A854 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--