Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6596DE0173 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:09:36 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.308 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.308 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.243, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.55, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id McxYIBmR5vw0 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:09:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8EAC6DE0B4F for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:09:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aO5Ef-0002TI-4g; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 10:08:49 -0500 Received: (nullmailer pid 17863 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 26 Jan 2016 15:09:26 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Maarten Aertsen , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: notmuch insert --keep fails in parallel w/ notmuch new In-Reply-To: <20160124154800.19103.24730@kardo2.rtsn.nl> References: <20160124154800.19103.24730@kardo2.rtsn.nl> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+26~g9404723 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 11:09:26 -0400 Message-ID: <87a8nsz8bd.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 15:09:36 -0000 Maarten Aertsen writes: > > I had a short chat with j4ni on #notmuch, where he said: > < j4ni> Sagi: oh bummer, we try to open the db first, and bail out > early. we should change the order of that (at least with --keep). > FWIW, I agree it's a bug, and it should be not too hard to fix by moving the open after the call to maildir write new. d