Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4355640DBC1 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 19:45:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TzHRPuL5dlmO for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 19:44:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from defaultvalue.org (defaultvalue.org [70.85.129.156]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE9D840DBC4 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 19:44:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: rlb@defaultvalue.org) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E979590D34; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 21:44:49 -0600 (CST) Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4679614E09D; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 21:44:56 -0600 (CST) From: Rob Browning To: Andreas Amann Subject: Re: Notmuch Ruby bindings References: <8639xkv1kz.fsf@harikalardiyari.ev> <87vd47n20a.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87sjzbn1w8.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87iq07n16w.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 21:44:56 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Amann's message of "Mon, 08 Nov 2010 19:21:50 +0000") Message-ID: <87vd45n8p3.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 03:45:02 -0000 Andreas Amann writes: > After a number of embarrassing mails I use the attached patch, which > changes the default behaviour of "r" to "reply to sender only". Usual > reply to everybody is "R". Maybe you prefer reversed binding? At least in gnus: r - start reply to author R - start reply to author, including a copy of the original f - start reply to all F - start reply to all, including a copy of the original I believe f/F probably respect Mail-Followup-To. FWIW -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4