Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDAEF429E25 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 08:05:48 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v88BQiIvH7Mg for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 08:05:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10518431FB6 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 08:05:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by wibhq2 with SMTP id hq2so7628748wib.26 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 08:05:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.80.164 with SMTP id s4mr8120201wix.7.1325174746681; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 08:05:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net (host81-149-164-25.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [81.149.164.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z5sm84329082wix.5.2011.12.29.08.05.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 29 Dec 2011 08:05:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 30000) id AB6EDA0A99; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 16:05:43 +0000 (GMT) To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] test: Add tests for advance/rewind. In-Reply-To: <1325160490-23472-2-git-send-email-dme@dme.org> References: <1324665712-2419-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org> <1325160490-23472-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org> <1325160490-23472-2-git-send-email-dme@dme.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+137~gc71852b (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.92.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: David Edmondson Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 16:05:39 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 16:05:49 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain What's the general feeling about this approach to producing tests for the emacs UI? (That is, code the test in a .el file and call the relevant function(s) from the test harness.) It makes it simpler to develop and maintain the test (because you can do more work with traditional emacs support for editing elisp), but might make interpreting failures more difficult (the test harness mostly just reports 'failed'). --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk78j9MACgkQaezQq/BJZRY67QCdE5kTGGXNl55lFxVKqBUoiTyK w6oAn1wBkQi4Qcb4VbbCFMeFE1Hbz2+R =kvi0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--