Return-Path: <awg@xvx.ca>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A931431FBC
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 20:09:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.7
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id lu+Ty7r2YVLd for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Sat, 25 Feb 2012 20:09:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com
	[209.85.215.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 534AE431FAE
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 20:09:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by lahd3 with SMTP id d3so4339058lah.26
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 20:09:25 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of awg@xvx.ca designates 10.112.49.135
	as permitted sender) client-ip=10.112.49.135; 
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com;
	spf=pass (google.com: domain of awg@xvx.ca designates
	10.112.49.135 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=awg@xvx.ca
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.112.49.135])
	by 10.112.49.135 with SMTP id u7mr3481786lbn.86.1330229365720 (num_hops
	= 1); Sat, 25 Feb 2012 20:09:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.49.135 with SMTP id u7mr2646425lbn.86.1330208709973; Sat,
	25 Feb 2012 14:25:09 -0800 (PST)
Sender: awg@xvx.ca
Received: by 10.152.127.67 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 14:25:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [96.52.216.56]
In-Reply-To: <87ty2e4n6r.fsf@zancas.localnet>
References: <1329893199-21630-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>
	<87ty2e4n6r.fsf@zancas.localnet>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 15:25:09 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: HNXCPSvzP8S1e2JI7lGum9QhssY
Message-ID:
 <CAMoJFUuhqwjSZpW2uaHsC+5H_VmAF0TewtLJ-H6jfTWWLsM6fA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] Reply improvements
From: Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>
To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State:
 ALoCoQm73i1nWAE/4v1BtYujSo8c576UanohyIFPPqPUru5wmlv0i2Kv/At+H0XeKYg5jM93FP8w
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 04:09:28 -0000

On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 14:29, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
> By coincidence I "unpromoted it", perhaps because I was missing
> context. It seemed strange to push one patch from the middle of the
> series.

I think that part was promoted by Austin because one of his
otherwise-ready patches relies on it, and it doesn't change any
functionality.

Austin, can you confirm this?