Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10C0431FB6 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 06:01:47 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pTnUMu4ZE08p for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 06:01:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E591431FAE for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 06:01:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034089108.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net ([156.34.89.108] helo=zancas.localnet) by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWSfw-0008Nf-DU; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 10:01:44 -0400 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1TWSfr-0004IT-06; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 10:01:39 -0400 From: David Bremner To: Damien Cassou , Mark Walters Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: display tags in notmuch-show's header-line with links to search In-Reply-To: References: <1352234344-28119-1-git-send-email-damien.cassou@gmail.com> <87txt2z5lq.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+75~g984212d (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 10:01:38 -0400 Message-ID: <87r4o4i471.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam_bar: - Cc: notmuch mailing list X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 14:01:47 -0000 Damien Cassou writes: > > I don't care and can change it without problem. I picked 'tager' > because it's shorter and I like to have a lot of information in my > function names. What is the opinion of others? > as far as I know, tagger is the common English spelling, so please use that. d