Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93E2431FD2 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:47:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ufnR4kd9RMh3 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:47:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sflc.info (mail.sflc.info [207.86.247.70]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68569431FAF for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:47:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ool-457af02d.dyn.optonline.net [69.122.240.45]) by mail.sflc.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4640BB4C018; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:47:48 +0000 (UTC) From: James Vasile To: David Bremner , notmuch mailing list Subject: Re: [PATCH] don't show x-foo tags in search view In-Reply-To: <87liepw0b4.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca> References: <87fw4x3y3e.fsf@hackervisions.org> <87liepw0b4.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+139~g3c998ca (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:47:45 -0400 Message-ID: <87a9v53vry.fsf@hackervisions.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:47:50 -0000 --=-=-= David Bremner writes: > James Vasile writes: > >> My filters create tags like x-bogotrained-spam that are for internal >> bookkeeping. I don't mind seeing them in the 'show' view, but I didn't >> want them cluttering my 'search' view. This patch omits x-foo and X-foo >> tags from the 'search' view. > > I understand this scratches your itch, but what about something more > customizable? > > d I thought it was fairly general as is, but you're right it could be more customizable. I'll rewrite it with a regex the user can customize. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQjt1hAAoJECaDklOuuidYVJoH/2mfIDONSBtw0LP/RrZ/KiJO ZAZR8CdsrKEMu8xNfRCgiVwfuTxNImo5Y3JhUYfA1d0epc/nrkn2t3779rjMgECc 0j89QOCbx/6ind+dnS94GTFoIBAtF0+EcsREzZY3WSTLI1KFVgIakPTrdArVq43f Jp98VJfEeynhu3w9bi8/s+83521hr4CA5zZVQjqXoFRj0DwW2/s0BRmcs0waWm3O v1/46eBJPYnYJTfNnIOdTnTHBo/e7QDsNwf6m+crs86BvxRak24vf/0umal/IX3U R7YrydH0e33nZINOHP1uo3fl/XjBeF5uq2ekFDpTPisk6CehnRyO1ms8oqNBKBc= =xae7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--