Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055DC6DE0943 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 08:29:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.273 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.273 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.273] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F4nG_eqF87j8 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 08:29:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tuna.imca.aps.anl.gov (tuna.imca.aps.anl.gov [164.54.200.33]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37CD6DE0352 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 08:29:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mink.imca.aps.anl.gov (seal.imca.aps.anl.gov [164.54.200.39]) by tuna.imca.aps.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E0920067; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 10:29:04 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <55940744.7050100@imca-cat.org> Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 10:29:08 -0500 From: "J. Lewis Muir" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nate Eagleson , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] build: Support Mac OS X 10.6.8 References: <1435699747-13591-1-git-send-email-nate@nateeag.com> <1435699747-13591-2-git-send-email-nate@nateeag.com> In-Reply-To: <1435699747-13591-2-git-send-email-nate@nateeag.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 15:29:10 -0000 On 6/30/15 4:29 PM, Nate Eagleson wrote: > +# Mac OS X 10.6 has a built-in libutil.dylib that prevents ld from > +# picking up notmuch's libutil.a. The best way to prefer our local > +# libutil.a is to specify it via absolute path, which should work on > +# all supported OSes. > +LIBUTIL_PATH=${srcdir}/util/libutil.a Hi, Nate. I think it would be better to make the above comment not specific to OS X, but instead just refer to "systems that have a built-in util library" or similar. For example, NetBSD has a built-in util library [1]. I don't have access to a FreeBSD system, but it looks like FreeBSD might have a built-in util library too [2]. Similarly for the one-line commit summary since this change is not specific to OS X. Regards, Lewis [1] http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?libutil++NetBSD-current [2] http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/lib/libutil/Makefile?view=markup