Return-Path: <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0292431FBC
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  9 May 2014 06:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.799
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
	FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id DntpevwaP-MW for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Fri,  9 May 2014 06:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yh0-f50.google.com (mail-yh0-f50.google.com
	[209.85.213.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 691DE431FBF
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  9 May 2014 06:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yh0-f50.google.com with SMTP id 29so3665861yhl.23
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 09 May 2014 06:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=LIFshFd/tgqyxwJ6O3jxsODqVM1wrcYUV/lMBzsEH74=;
	b=Pg1koQFefdGw0BBavPLpIZr8TLplF9MobytaThU00FDHBa3g7ZDHIBMQzi4MREu2JG
	5+l5tRVj9MKGDAmuSAUz08o0uol0Jhuq/TsYes06gJP6YWPioNDmqqJPvmvWCrSLzrdA
	FaJAg2FS90fh9u9sbQ8SEl5pSu9ZofE0xvHSTjI2woDaemveVispPdHpW8Cq92urSdL0
	cHGcdcIDoiRsBdOm4sITnC13292CaXaN4GnWpFlLY/4oudX3952cDZN9Tg3QfwTGOohk
	Vsw7HQdERX5dMhcbH0wg2JYoOD/NXzJl2+c2Xt55uCsqc++9XdluA50365PfJFWtLvst
	sXjA==
X-Received: by 10.236.203.225 with SMTP id f61mr240223yho.51.1399640981877;
	Fri, 09 May 2014 06:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (189-211-224-40.static.axtel.net. [189.211.224.40])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n65sm6091941yhc.8.2014.05.09.06.09.39
	for <multiple recipients>
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Fri, 09 May 2014 06:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 08:09:37 -0500
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>, 
	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <536cd39189c55_4ea9112f308ab@nysa.notmuch>
In-Reply-To: <20140509125004.GF2634@chitra.no-ip.org>
References:
 <CA+kKtKA8Q5z6Pys9RAumLTiJvmGwWYKGXDkKr9Mh_6ecV-7sdA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+kKtKCP8Oo2sHz5Cd0+=BmS9UK=b2h9GrGopUFwWZ=GJUXqyA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140508203019.GA2374@chitra.no-ip.org>
	<20140508212100.GD23124@vilya.m0g.net>
	<20140508220046.GB2374@chitra.no-ip.org>
	<20140508222931.GU28634@odin.tremily.us>
	<20140508224527.GC2374@chitra.no-ip.org>
	<20140508233530.GV28634@odin.tremily.us>
	<20140509113951.GD2634@chitra.no-ip.org>
	<536cccbb2aa31_771b11792f0c0@nysa.notmuch>
	<20140509125004.GF2634@chitra.no-ip.org>
Subject: Re: Submodules for language bindings (was: Github?)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 13:09:48 -0000

Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 07:40:27AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > 
> > > To explain my point with RPM specifics, if I were to
> > > use separate spec files, python-notmuch would have:
> > > 
> > >   Requires: notmuch >= <version-string>
> > > 
> > > As you can see this only allows for tracking dependency based on
> > > official version numbers.  With more bindings, many with different
> > > version dependencies, this becomes quite cumbersome;
> > 
> > No, it doesn't:
> > 
> >   %package notmuch-ruby
> >   Requires: notmuch = %{version}-%{release}, ruby
> 
> Doesn't that work when you have one spec file for all sub-packages (as I
> do now)?  I was responding to Trevor's suggestion about not having
> sub-packages, IOW, different spec files for different packages.

Ah. I don't see why anybody would want different spec files for
different subpackages.

-- 
Felipe Contreras