Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EEE5431FBF; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:20:23 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xlodDKlbAf7p; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:20:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB70431FAE; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:20:21 -0800 (PST) From: Carl Worth To: Bart Trojanowski , Stefan Schmidt In-Reply-To: <20091121191402.GA17268@jukie.net> References: <20091121183909.GG24944@jukie.net> <20091121190606.GA24602@excalibur.local> <20091121191402.GA17268@jukie.net> Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:20:10 +0100 Message-ID: <871vjr4olh.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [notmuch] notmuch vim support X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:20:23 -0000 On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:14:02 -0500, Bart Trojanowski wrote: > Perfect. How would you like to proceed with the initial integration? > Pulling my tree, or me squashing all the changes into a single patch? > Also, are you OK with where the files live (ie under a vim directory). I'm glad to pull (it will be nice for you to have the accurate history). And a vim directory sounds perfect. Or should we do interfaces/emacs and interfaces/vim ? I don't know. > After that, do you want me to submit patches by email, via pull > requests, or giving me push access to a branch at your repo? Email or pull requests are fine. You're clearly the "owner" of the vim stuff, so don't expect any refusals to pull from me. (And feel free to ping me out of band if you don't want to clutter the list with pull requests---but it's more likely that you'll want to let people on the list know about changes anyway.) > BTW, have you considered using github or gitorious so branch management > becomes a distributed problem? I don't see any advantage to have the main notmuch repository there. We've already got a server with a nice name. The nice thing about git, of course, is that branches and repositories can be distributed arbitrarily and there's no problem. -Carl