Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCEB431FBC for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 05:21:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NgeuHM3LwM8b for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 05:21:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from zproxy110.enst.fr (zproxy110.enst.fr [137.194.52.33]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57878431FB6 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 05:21:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zproxy110.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F89102091; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:21:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from zproxy110.enst.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zproxy110.enst.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id vUYeW-xU9EC8; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:21:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zproxy110.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5558B102098; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:21:17 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zproxy110.enst.fr Received: from zproxy110.enst.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zproxy110.enst.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id nj1YW3wTt3LI; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:21:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (inf-11879.int-evry.fr [157.159.110.251]) by zproxy110.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22394102031; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:21:17 +0100 (CET) From: Olivier Berger To: David Bremner Subject: Re: tag:deleted messages immediately deleted ? In-Reply-To: <87r3wx9eaq.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> References: <877fyseuq8.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr> <87d28ku7rt.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <871tp0ek8b.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr> <87lhn8fmq9.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <877fypre49.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr> <87r3wx9eaq.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:21:16 +0100 Message-ID: <87d28gd703.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:21:32 -0000 David Bremner writes: > Olivier Berger writes: > >> >> So, I've tried and removed the spam tag from the exclude_tags, and >> suddenly, the search in emacs responds with the 981... which means that >> most of the deleted ones had the spam tag too. >> >> >> So it means that if one explicitely requests an excluded tag, other >> exclude tags still apply. Not sure this is the desirable option : maybe >> if one exclusion is waved, then others should too ? >> >> What do you think ? > > I'm not sure. What you suggest sounds sensible enough. On the other hand > the way it behaves now is precisely as documented; I'm not sure whether > this is because of a design choice or ease of implementation. Maybe Mark > can comment further on that. I guess there are even people who > like/rely on the current functionality, since there always are ;). > In any case, there has been a change in the way this worked. For the moment, I'm using the following saved search : (tag:deleted or tag:spam) and tag:deleted which will display the deleted mails. FWIW. Best regards, -- Olivier BERGER http://www-public.telecom-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8 Ingenieur Recherche - Dept INF Institut Mines-Telecom, Telecom SudParis, Evry (France)